When reviewing 360-degree feedback, look beyond the evaluation itself. A thoughtful, well-structured review from a junior employee, offering both praise and constructive criticism, is a strong signal of managerial potential. It demonstrates the ability to think critically and communicate effectively, key traits for future leaders.
Related Insights
To overcome loyalty bias toward long-tenured employees, leaders should reframe performance reviews. Instead of asking if they are "good enough," ask, "Knowing our future needs, would I hire this person for this role today?" This clarifies whether their skills match future requirements, enabling objective talent decisions.
To perform a simple but effective 360-degree review, ask your boss, peers, and direct reports two questions: "What are my strengths?" and "What could I improve upon?" The vague nature of the second question helps bubble up the most critical areas for growth without leading the witness.
Elix mitigates the fear of 360-degree reviews by providing every full-time employee with an external coach. This structure ensures that critical feedback doesn't just feel exposing but is paired with professional guidance, turning potential blind spots into actionable development goals and fostering a true growth culture.
A common pitfall for new managers is seeking validation by being liked. A great leader's role is to provide constructive challenges and uncomfortable feedback, which fosters genuine growth and ultimately earns the team's gratitude and respect.
Annual or quarterly performance reviews are high-pressure, judgmental events that create fear. A more effective approach is to reframe management as coaching. This means providing frequent, trust-based feedback focused on developing an employee's long-term potential, rather than simply rating their past performance.
When giving feedback, structure it in three parts. "What" is the specific observation. "So what" explains its impact on you or the situation. "Now what" provides a clear, forward-looking suggestion for change. This framework ensures feedback is understood and actionable.
To prevent defensiveness when giving critical feedback, managers should explicitly state their positive intent. Saying "I'm giving this because I care about you and your career" shifts the focus from a personal attack to a supportive act of leadership aimed at helping them grow.
Most employees avoid giving leaders negative feedback for fear of repercussions. However, a leader's ability to improve is directly tied to their willingness to accept the 'emotional hit' of criticism. The team member who provides unvarnished truth is therefore the most critical for achieving long-term goals.
A nine-box grid plots employees on two axes: current performance and future potential. This tool helps leaders make nuanced talent decisions, correctly identifying valuable assets like a star salesperson who "exceeds expectations" in performance but has "low potential" for promotion because they don't want a management role.
Senior executives are, by definition, excellent at interviewing, making the process unreliable for signal. Instead of relying on a polished performance, ask to see the 360-degree performance reviews from their previous company. This provides a more honest, ground-truth assessment of their strengths and weaknesses.
