Reflecting on 2015, Tyler Cowen notes it was a "stellar" year for fiction (Houllebecq's *Submission*) but an "awful" year for movies. This contrast suggests ambitious literature can have more enduring cultural impact and artistic significance than even the most acclaimed films from the same period.
In an age of infinite content, the most powerful filter for quality is time (the Lindy effect). Prioritizing books, art, and ideas that have remained relevant for centuries ensures you are consuming profound, time-tested wisdom rather than transient trends, optimizing your 'mental diet' for depth.
Even in a world where AI can produce high-quality outputs like writing instantly, the process of doing the work remains critical for human learning. Tyler Cowen argues that the act of writing is a valuable cognitive process that should not be abandoned, regardless of technological advances.
"Frankenstein" is foundational because it captures a crucial turning point in Western thought. It explores the shift from God as the sole creator to humans as creators, introducing anxieties about scientific overreach and moral responsibility that have defined technological discourse ever since.
Judd Apatow argues initial reviews and box office numbers are fleeting metrics. The real test is a movie's long-term staying power. Films that flopped initially can become beloved classics a decade later, proving their value through sustained audience engagement on streaming platforms.
The popular perception of Galileo challenging religious dogma has a greater cultural impact than the specific, nuanced arguments in his actual writings. A book's power can derive from what people believe it represents, even if they've never read it or misunderstand its contents.
The perception of cultural stagnation is flawed. While mainstream blockbusters may be worse, the overall quality and variety of culture (e.g., global cinema) is stronger than ever. Pundits miss this because quality has shifted from a shared monoculture to numerous high-quality niches that require active discovery.
Unlike watching a movie as an observer, reading makes you embody the character, lighting up the brain as if you're living their experiences. This unique power to generate deep empathy is why books face such intense banning efforts from those who want to control who children empathize with.
The legacy of a novel like "Pride and Prejudice" isn't solely defined by its intellectual or social influence. The immense and lasting joy it brings to readers across generations is a profound, often underrated, form of changing the world.
To create lasting impact, shift focus from content with a short lifespan to mediums that endure. Books, for example, hold their value for decades, representing a deeper investment of wisdom and attention compared to a podcast or a 60-second clip.
Long novels, now the gold standard for deep focus, were once considered dangerous “junk food” that distracted people from prayer and duty. This historical pattern suggests our current panic over digital media may be similarly shortsighted and lacking perspective.