Long novels, now the gold standard for deep focus, were once considered dangerous “junk food” that distracted people from prayer and duty. This historical pattern suggests our current panic over digital media may be similarly shortsighted and lacking perspective.
Related Insights
In an age of infinite content, the most powerful filter for quality is time (the Lindy effect). Prioritizing books, art, and ideas that have remained relevant for centuries ensures you are consuming profound, time-tested wisdom rather than transient trends, optimizing your 'mental diet' for depth.
Accepting the narrative that attention spans are shrinking is dangerous. It can lead educators and creators to give up on encouraging deep, focused tasks like reading long novels, thereby causing the very outcome they fear by lowering their expectations and standards.
Outrage-driven news follows a predictable six-step cycle: a fringe story appears, one side reacts, the story gets amplified, the other side counter-reacts, and so on. This banal loop captures attention but distracts from more significant societal problems.
Despite competing with short-form content like TikTok, Ken Burns' long documentaries succeed because they are built on compelling storytelling. This challenges the myth of shrinking attention spans, suggesting instead that audiences demand more engaging content, regardless of its length.
Critics lament declining focus, yet popular video games like Baldur's Gate 3 demand 75+ hours of intense concentration. This is over five times longer than Wagner's entire Ring Cycle opera, a historical benchmark for sustained cultural attention, quantitatively refuting the attention decline narrative.
Studying history can be a calming practice. It reveals that past eras were often far worse than the present, providing a soothing perspective that humanity has endured and overcome similar or greater challenges before. This counters the modern feeling of unique, terminal decline.
Societal fears, or "moral panics," are cyclical. While the targets change (from witchcraft to 5G wireless), the underlying tactics of exploiting fears around child safety and innocence remain consistent throughout history, repeating the same patterns.
The same technologies accused of shortening attention spans are also creating highly obsessive micro-tribes and fandoms. This contradicts the narrative of a universal decline in focus, suggesting a shift in what we pay attention to, not an inability to focus.
While society now worries about distraction (ADHD), the 19th century’s concern was “monomania”—an obsessive, machine-like focus on a single task demanded by industrial capitalism. This shows that anxieties about attention are shaped by the economic structures of the era.
The standard 250-page book is often a relic of a publishing business model that equates physical weight with value, leading to padded content. This reveals an opportunity for concise, high-impact formats like "one-hour books" that respect the reader's time and the idea's natural length.
