The perception of cultural stagnation is flawed. While mainstream blockbusters may be worse, the overall quality and variety of culture (e.g., global cinema) is stronger than ever. Pundits miss this because quality has shifted from a shared monoculture to numerous high-quality niches that require active discovery.
Related Insights
In an age of infinite content, the most powerful filter for quality is time (the Lindy effect). Prioritizing books, art, and ideas that have remained relevant for centuries ensures you are consuming profound, time-tested wisdom rather than transient trends, optimizing your 'mental diet' for depth.
"Culture" is often used too broadly. Brands should focus on "Little C" culture by tapping into existing pillars like music or sports. "Big C" culture—macro societal shifts—is a rare feat achievable only by platform-level brands like TikTok.
As AI drives the cost of content creation to zero, the world floods with 'average' material. In this environment, the most valuable and scarce skill becomes 'taste'—the ability to identify, curate, and champion high-quality, commercially viable work. This elevates the role of human curators over pure creators.
![Ari Emanuel - The Anti-AI Bet - [Invest Like the Best, EP.448] thumbnail](https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/c5910280-c4dd-11f0-94be-ab6a7a5865b0/image/1e5a2263eb62fcde200846919e24419a.jpg?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&max-w=3000&max-h=3000&fit=crop&auto=format,compress)
As AI makes content creation easy, a cultural divide emerges. 'Lowbrow' culture imitates machines (e.g., using LLM-like speech). 'Highbrow' culture deliberately creates 'machine-resistant' art and communication to distinguish human effort and creativity from automated output.
Ken Burns refutes the common complaint that attention spans are shrinking. He points to binge-watching culture—where viewers consume entire seasons of shows in a weekend—as definitive proof that audiences still have an appetite for deep, long-form content. He notes this panic is not new, citing the telegraph's arrival in the 1850s.
As major studios pull back from theatrical releases, a new opportunity emerges for cinemas. They can pivot from showing new blockbusters to becoming "revival houses" that program classic, niche, and cult films. This caters to audiences seeking curated, communal experiences beyond at-home streaming, as seen with the rise of anime screenings.
The same technologies accused of shortening attention spans are also creating highly obsessive micro-tribes and fandoms. This contradicts the narrative of a universal decline in focus, suggesting a shift in what we pay attention to, not an inability to focus.
Instead of everything simply getting dumber, media is splitting into two extremes. Both hyper-short (four-second videos) and hyper-long (four-hour podcasts) content are thriving. It is the middle-length, moderately complex content that is being hollowed out as audiences gravitate towards the poles.
The creative industry is harming itself more through internal cynicism and inaction than from external threats like AI. Creatives spend too much time writing thought pieces about a perceived decline instead of actively making groundbreaking work.
Long novels, now the gold standard for deep focus, were once considered dangerous “junk food” that distracted people from prayer and duty. This historical pattern suggests our current panic over digital media may be similarly shortsighted and lacking perspective.