The lack of innovative consumer AI applications stems not from technology gaps, but from a talent bottleneck. The primary obstacles are a small global pool of exceptional consumer product leaders and founders' fear that incumbent platforms will simply copy any successful new idea.
Related Insights
As foundational AI models become more accessible, the key to winning the market is shifting from having the most advanced model to creating the best user experience. This "age of productization" means skilled product managers who can effectively package AI capabilities are becoming as crucial as the researchers themselves.
As AI commoditizes the 'how' of building products, the most critical human skills become the 'what' and 'why.' Product sense (knowing ingredients for a great product) and product taste (discerning what’s missing) will become far more valuable than process management.
AI drastically accelerates the ability of incumbents and competitors to clone new products, making early traction and features less defensible. For seed investors, this means the traditional "first-mover advantage" is fragile, shifting the investment thesis heavily towards the quality and adaptability of the founding team.
As foundational AI models become commoditized, the key differentiator is shifting from marginal improvements in model capability to superior user experience and productization. Companies that focus on polish, ease of use, and thoughtful integration will win, making product managers the new heroes of the AI race.
The mantra 'ideas are cheap' fails in the current AI paradigm. With 'scaling' as the dominant execution strategy, the industry has more companies than novel ideas. This makes truly new concepts, not just execution, the scarcest resource and the primary bottleneck for breakthrough progress.
The most significant hurdle for businesses adopting revenue-driving AI is often internal resistance from senior leaders. Their fear, lack of understanding, or refusal to experiment can hold the entire organization back from crucial innovation.
The AI startup scene is dominated by very young founders with no baggage and repeat entrepreneurs. Noticeably absent are mid-level managers from large tech companies, a previously common founder profile. This group appears hesitant, possibly because their established skills feel less relevant in the new AI paradigm.
Despite AI tools making it easier than ever to design, code, and launch applications, many people feel stuck and don't know what to build. This suggests a deficit in big-picture thinking and problem identification, not a lack of technical capability.
As AI makes it incredibly easy to build products, the market will be flooded with options. The critical, differentiating skill will no longer be technical execution but human judgment: deciding *what* should exist, which features matter, and the right distribution strategy. Synthesizing these elements is where future value lies.
Contrary to the belief that distribution is the new moat, the crucial differentiator in AI is talent. Building a truly exceptional AI product is incredibly nuanced and complex, requiring a rare skill set. The scarcity of people who can build off models in an intelligent, tasteful way is the real technological moat, not just access to data or customers.
