Despite AI tools making it easier than ever to design, code, and launch applications, many people feel stuck and don't know what to build. This suggests a deficit in big-picture thinking and problem identification, not a lack of technical capability.

Related Insights

True creative mastery emerges from an unpredictable human process. AI can generate options quickly but bypasses this journey, losing the potential for inexplicable, last-minute genius that defines truly great work. It optimizes for speed at the cost of brilliance.

With AI agents automating raw code generation, an engineer's role is evolving beyond pure implementation. To stay valuable, engineers must now cultivate a deep understanding of business context and product taste to know *what* to build and *why*, not just *how*.

Instead of asking an AI to directly build something, the more effective approach is to instruct it on *how* to solve the problem: gather references, identify best-in-class libraries, and create a framework before implementation. This means working one level of abstraction higher than the code itself.

Perplexity's VP of Design, Henry Modiset, states that when hiring, he values product intuition above all else. AI can generate options, but the essential, irreplaceable skill for designers is the ability to choose what to build, how it fits the market, and why users will care.

The main barrier to AI's impact is not its technical flaws but the fact that most organizations don't understand what it can actually do. Advanced features like 'deep research' and reasoning models remain unused by over 95% of professionals, leaving immense potential and competitive advantage untapped.

The perceived limits of today's AI are not inherent to the models themselves but to our failure to build the right "agentic scaffold" around them. There's a "model capability overhang" where much more potential can be unlocked with better prompting, context engineering, and tool integrations.

The mantra 'ideas are cheap' fails in the current AI paradigm. With 'scaling' as the dominant execution strategy, the industry has more companies than novel ideas. This makes truly new concepts, not just execution, the scarcest resource and the primary bottleneck for breakthrough progress.

Technical implementation is becoming easier with AI. The critical, and now more valuable, skill is the ability to deeply understand customer needs, communicate effectively, and guide a product to market fit. The focus is shifting from "how to build it" to "what to build and why."

Companies racing to add AI features while ignoring core product principles—like solving a real problem for a defined market—are creating a wave of failed products, dubbed "AI slop" by product coach Teresa Torres.

The promise of AI shouldn't be a one-click solution that removes the user. Instead, AI should be a collaborative partner that augments human capacity. A successful AI product leaves room for user participation, making them feel like they are co-building the experience and have a stake in the outcome.

Powerful AI Tools Have Created an "Idea Crisis" Where Builders Don't Know What to Create | RiffOn