A leader's most difficult but necessary task is to be truthful, even when it hurts. Avoiding hard realities by "fluffing around" creates a false sense of security and prevents problems from being solved. Delivering honest feedback empathetically is critical for progress and building trust, distinguishing effective leaders from ineffective ones.
Related Insights
The biggest professional and personal problems often stem from a lack of candor. Withholding honest feedback to "keep the peace" is a destructive act that enables bad behavior and builds personal resentment over time. Delivering the truth, even when difficult, is a gift that addresses problems head-on and prevents future failure.
True kindness in leadership isn't about avoiding confrontation. According to Figma's CEO, it's a leader's duty to provide direct, even difficult, feedback. Withholding critical information is ultimately unkind because it lets problems escalate, harming the individual and the team in the long run.
A leader's desire to be liked can lead to a lack of candor, which is ultimately cruel. Avoiding difficult feedback allows underperformance to fester and makes an eventual firing a shocking surprise. This damages trust more than direct, consistent, and tough conversations would have.
Most managers fail at feedback by avoiding conflict. A better framework combines three elements: toughness (directly confronting the problem), kindness (offering support to improve), and clarity (defining specific actions and the potential positive outcome).
The most selfish thing a leader can do is withhold feedback because giving it would be uncomfortable. In that moment, you are optimizing for your own comfort at the expense of your colleague's growth. High-performance teams require radical candor, which is fundamentally an unselfish act.
True kindness in a leader is not about avoiding confrontation to be 'nice.' Dylan Field argues it's a leader's duty to deliver direct, even hard, feedback. Withholding it is fundamentally unkind because it lets issues fester, ultimately causing more harm to the individual and the team.
Daniel Lubetzky argues that niceness (politeness) can be detrimental in the workplace as it avoids necessary, difficult feedback. True kindness requires the strength to be honest and provide constructive criticism that helps colleagues and the organization grow, even if it's uncomfortable.
Most employees avoid giving leaders negative feedback for fear of repercussions. However, a leader's ability to improve is directly tied to their willingness to accept the 'emotional hit' of criticism. The team member who provides unvarnished truth is therefore the most critical for achieving long-term goals.
Complete transparency can create panic and demotivation. A leader's role is to filter harsh realities, like potential layoffs, and deliver an authentic message that is both realistic and optimistic enough for the team to absorb productively, rather than sharing every fear.
To create a vision that inspires belief and momentum, leaders must first be truthful about the current situation, even if it's negative. If a team senses the leader is disconnected from reality or spinning facts, they won't buy into the future vision, and momentum will stall.
