Despite new US sanctions on Russian oil producers, Goldman Sachs remains bearish, forecasting a decline. They argue that spare capacity from OPEC, exemptions for buyers, and the reorganization of trade networks will mitigate any supply disruption, preventing a sustained price spike and leading to lower prices by 2026.

Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.

Analysts create a false “manufactured surplus” by misinterpreting data. They incorrectly count US Strategic Petroleum Reserve additions as market supply and fail to recognize China's massive inventory buildup as a strategic reserve for war or sanctions, not commercial oversupply.

A potential price collapse will be averted by the market's own circular logic. Sub-$60 prices will stimulate an extra 500,000 barrels per day of demand from price-sensitive regions while simultaneously forcing high-cost non-OPEC producers to shut down production, creating a natural market equilibrium.

The primary impact of U.S. sanctions on Russian oil is not a reduction in supply but a compression of profit margins. Russia is forced to offer deeper discounts, estimated at $3-$5 per barrel below pre-sanction levels, to compensate buyers for increased logistical and financial risks, ensuring export flows remain stable.

Bearish forecasts for an oil surplus are wrong because they ignore seasonal demand within OPEC+ nations. Production increases will be consumed domestically for power generation during Ramadan, the Hajj pilgrimage, and summer cooling, preventing them from reaching the global market.

Despite his stated goal of lowering oil prices, President Trump's aggressive sanctions on Venezuela, Iran, and Russia have removed significant supply from the market. This creates logistical bottlenecks and "oil on water" buildups, effectively tightening the market and keeping prices higher than they would be otherwise.

A peaceful resolution in Ukraine would likely be bullish for oil. Russia would need to repair its refineries, increasing its domestic demand for crude oil. This internal consumption would reduce the amount of crude available for export, tightening the global market and pushing prices up.

The staggering rise of U.S. shale production disrupted the global oil market, fundamentally altering its power structure. This disruption directly pushed rivals Russia and Saudi Arabia to form the OPEC+ alliance in 2016 to collectively manage supply and counter American influence.