Despite new US sanctions on Russian oil producers, Goldman Sachs remains bearish, forecasting a decline. They argue that spare capacity from OPEC, exemptions for buyers, and the reorganization of trade networks will mitigate any supply disruption, preventing a sustained price spike and leading to lower prices by 2026.

Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.

Analysts create a false “manufactured surplus” by misinterpreting data. They incorrectly count US Strategic Petroleum Reserve additions as market supply and fail to recognize China's massive inventory buildup as a strategic reserve for war or sanctions, not commercial oversupply.

Contrary to bearish sentiment, oil demand has consistently exceeded expectations. The market's weakness stems from a supply glut, primarily from the Americas, which has outpaced demand growth by more than twofold, leading to a structural surplus and significant inventory builds.

Traditional energy models incorrectly started with climate supply targets. A more accurate approach models fundamental demand drivers first (population, GDP), revealing a massive, underestimated need for all energy types to meet future growth, challenging supply-centric narratives.

The crude oil market is trapped in a recurring monthly pattern. For the first half of each month, the forward curve weakens on fears of a supply glut, nearly flipping into contango. Then, a sudden geopolitical shock mid-month causes the curve to snap back into pronounced backwardation, delaying the surplus.

A potential price collapse will be averted by the market's own circular logic. Sub-$60 prices will stimulate an extra 500,000 barrels per day of demand from price-sensitive regions while simultaneously forcing high-cost non-OPEC producers to shut down production, creating a natural market equilibrium.

Forecasters often miss that OPEC+ increases production based on demand for its own oil, not just overall global demand. Sanctions on rivals like Russia and Iran can boost demand for OPEC+ crude, prompting them to unwind cuts even when global demand growth seems weak.

Analysts misinterpret rising "oil on water" as a bearish sign. A country shifting exports to a more distant destination (e.g., Brazil to China instead of the US) increases the volume of oil in transit due to longer voyage times, but the actual available supply to the market can be declining.