A couple separated for three years after 35 years of marriage. This time apart allowed them to grow individually and escape a cycle of conflict. When they reunited, they could appreciate each other's core qualities again, leading to their best decade together. A long separation can sometimes save, not end, a relationship.
Couples often won't change unless they're in a crisis because comfort breeds inertia. A counterintuitive therapeutic technique is to intentionally apply pressure to "put them in crisis," forcing the couple out of their comfort zone to confront issues and make necessary changes.
Conflict in friendships should be welcomed, not avoided. The psychotherapeutic concept of 'rupture and repair' — a breach in the relationship followed by its restoration — is proof of a strong connection. Actively working through conflict facilitates growth, respect, and a deeper bond.
People cite specific events like affairs or fights as the reason for divorce. However, the root cause is a gradual loss of the shared story and purpose that once united them. The triggering event is merely the final chapter, not the whole story of the decline.
The idea of a constant 50/50 balance is a myth for ambitious couples. A healthier model is to view the relationship in seasons, where one partner may need 80% of the support during an intense period. This requires explicit conversations to ensure the balance shifts back over time, avoiding resentment.
Instead of always striving for peak connection ("the summit"), successful couples recognize stressful periods as storms that require a strategic retreat to "base camp." This temporary descent to focus on basics preserves the relationship for future ascents when conditions improve.
By internalizing that every relationship is temporary and will end, you see its true preciousness. This perspective shift, from entitlement to gratitude, encourages you to savor moments and prioritize connection, ultimately making the relationship stronger and more resilient. Love is loaned, not owned.
A common myth is that good relationships lack conflict. The reality is that the strength of a relationship is determined by its ability to manage and grow from conflict. The key metric is whether each argument makes the bond stronger (healing to 101%) or weaker (healing to 99%).
For couples feeling fatigued, a powerful exercise is to reenact a specific early date where they first felt a spark. This "time travel" involves recreating the setting, clothing, and even the mindset of uncertainty and excitement from that time, which can effectively reignite feelings of passion.
The success of a long-term relationship is better predicted by how partners handle conflict and disagreement than by how much they enjoy good times together. People are more likely to break up due to poor conflict resolution than a lack of peak experiences.
Conflict avoidance is not a sign of a healthy relationship. True intimacy is built through cycles of 'rupture and repair,' where disagreements are used as opportunities for deeper understanding. A relationship without conflict may be fragile, as its ability to repair has never been tested.