Inspired by Brené Brown, partners can avoid conflict by quantifying their emotional capacity. Stating "I'm at 20%" signals you don't have the energy for a difficult conversation. This allows your partner to adjust expectations, provide support, or table the issue, preventing a fight that would have been caused by depletion, not malice.

Unilaterally walking away from a fight can trigger a partner's abandonment issues. Terry Real advises contracting for breaks when calm, and during conflict, stating the reason for the break and a specific time of return. This turns a rupture into a structured pause.

During a shared trauma, couples often fail to communicate, leading to resentment. The solution isn't to pretend everything is okay, but to have the courage to state the problem bluntly (e.g., "This is a disaster... I don't like you right now"). This directness breaks the stalemate and forces open communication.

The key to a successful long-term relationship isn't just chemistry; it's a partner's psychological stability. This is measured by how quickly they return to their emotional baseline after a setback. This resilience is more predictive of success than more fleeting traits.

The idea of a constant 50/50 balance is a myth for ambitious couples. A healthier model is to view the relationship in seasons, where one partner may need 80% of the support during an intense period. This requires explicit conversations to ensure the balance shifts back over time, avoiding resentment.

According to researcher John Gottman, successful couples don't always resolve every fight. Many long-term partners acknowledge that some disagreements are perpetual and learn to live with them, accepting them as a feature of the relationship rather than a fatal flaw.

Contrary to popular belief, a degree of pessimism is a useful tool for building resilient relationships. Expecting a partner to be imperfect, frustrating, and disappointing at times creates a stronger foundation than entering a relationship with idealized, fragile expectations.

A common myth is that good relationships lack conflict. The reality is that the strength of a relationship is determined by its ability to manage and grow from conflict. The key metric is whether each argument makes the bond stronger (healing to 101%) or weaker (healing to 99%).

The success of a long-term relationship is better predicted by how partners handle conflict and disagreement than by how much they enjoy good times together. People are more likely to break up due to poor conflict resolution than a lack of peak experiences.