The primary cause of failure in engineering projects is not technical incompetence but a lack of visibility into budget, schedule, scope, and risk. Successful project execution hinges on addressing these core management areas before they derail the work.
Related Insights
There's often a massive gap between a company's strategic goals and where development teams actually spend time. In one case, only 2% of capacity was spent on the top strategic goal because teams are "magnets for requests" that derail progress on the big picture.
Surprising your manager with a major failure is one of the worst mistakes you can make. You must proactively communicate risks as soon as they arise. This gives your leader time to manage expectations up the chain and prevents them from being blindsided.
Individual contributors can dramatically increase their value by learning project management principles. Understanding how leaders think about scope, risk, and budget enables them to contribute more strategically, help their managers succeed, and accelerate their own careers.
Instead of complex prioritization frameworks like RICE, designers can use a more intuitive model based on Value, Cost, and Risk. This mirrors the mental calculation humans use for everyday decisions, allowing for a more holistic and natural conversation about project trade-offs.
Executives often avoid acknowledging a team's technical skill gaps, believing it damages morale. In reality, this sets the team up for failure by forcing them to say 'yes' to impossible tasks. Openly identifying gaps allows for a realistic plan to train, hire, or partner.
Owning a project launch means being accountable for its success, requiring more than execution. It involves proactively identifying all possible failure modes (technical, infrastructural, etc.) and systematically working backward to prevent them. This active risk mitigation is the essence of strong ownership.
To inject responsibility into a speed-obsessed culture, frame the conversation around specific risks. Create documented assumptions about what might break and, crucially, identify who bears the impact if things go wrong. This forces a deliberate consideration of consequences.
A project's success equals its technical quality multiplied by team acceptance. Technologists often fail by engineering perfect solutions that nobody buys into or owns. An 80%-correct solution fiercely defended by the team will always outperform a "perfect" one that is ignored.
Before starting a project, ask the team to imagine it has failed and write a story explaining why. This exercise in 'time travel' bypasses optimism bias and surfaces critical operational risks, resource gaps, and flawed assumptions that would otherwise be missed until it's too late.
The biggest blind spot for new managers is the temptation to fix individual problems themselves (e.g., a piece of bad code). This doesn't scale. They must elevate their thinking to solve the system that creates the problems (e.g., why bad code is being written in the first place).
