Individual contributors can dramatically increase their value by learning project management principles. Understanding how leaders think about scope, risk, and budget enables them to contribute more strategically, help their managers succeed, and accelerate their own careers.
Related Insights
The path to senior engineering levels is tied to the scope of your work's influence. Rather than explicitly seeking promotions, focus on projects with natural potential to grow from solving a team's problem to solving an organization's. The promotions will follow the impact.
To quickly gain a broad, foundational understanding of an adjacent field, read their interview prep books. An engineer reading a PM interview book will get a superficial but wide-ranging grasp of product thinking. This builds empathy and enables more productive conversations with cross-functional partners.
Effective engineering leadership is like farming: growth isn't achieved by demanding it from the plants. Leaders should obsess over inputs—clear goals, sound strategy, team structure, and operational rigor—to create the conditions for great engineering to happen naturally.
A critical career inflection point is moving from solely executing tasks (writing code) to influencing strategic decisions about what problems to solve. True value and impact come from being in the room where decisions are made, not just being the person who implements them.
Gain influence by curating a backlog of valuable "side quest" projects that address team pain points. Proactively offering these well-defined opportunities to other engineers helps them meet their career goals and establishes you as a key network hub and leader.
The primary cause of failure in engineering projects is not technical incompetence but a lack of visibility into budget, schedule, scope, and risk. Successful project execution hinges on addressing these core management areas before they derail the work.
To get product management buy-in for technical initiatives like refactoring or scaling, engineering leadership is responsible for translating the work into clear business or customer value. Instead of just stating the technical need, explain how it enables faster feature development or access to a larger customer base.
To prevent engineers from focusing internally on technical purity (e.g., unnecessary refactoring), leaders must consistently frame all work in terms of its value to the customer. Even tech debt should be justified by its external impact, such as improving security or enabling future features.
A superior prioritization framework calculates your marginal contribution: (Importance * [Success Probability with you - Success Probability without you]) / Time. This means working on a lower-priority project where you can be a hero is often more valuable than being a cog in a well-staffed, top-priority machine.
To deliver a high-stakes project on a tight deadline, an engineer took on product management responsibilities like defining scope and getting alignment. This ability to resolve ambiguity outside of pure engineering, which he calls the "product hybrid archetype," is a key differentiator for achieving senior-level impact.
