LLMs have hit a wall by scraping nearly all available public data. The next phase of AI development and competitive differentiation will come from training models on high-quality, proprietary data generated by human experts. This creates a booming "data as a service" industry for companies like Micro One that recruit and manage these experts.

The rapid progress of many LLMs was possible because they could leverage the same massive public dataset: the internet. In robotics, no such public corpus of robot interaction data exists. This “data void” means progress is tied to a company's ability to generate its own proprietary data.

As AI agents become sophisticated, they'll need to pay for services. Traditional banking is too slow and fragmented for them. Crypto, as the internet's native money, provides the instant, global, low-fee rails for AI agents to transact with each other and with web services, creating a major new use case.

The massive demand for GPUs from the crypto market provided a critical revenue stream for companies like NVIDIA during a slow period. This accelerated the development of the powerful parallel processing hardware that now underpins modern AI models.

Previously, imitation learning required a single expert to collect perfectly consistent data, a major bottleneck. Diffusion models unlocked the ability to train on multi-modal data from various non-expert collectors, shifting the challenge from finding niche experts to building scalable data acquisition and processing systems.

Bitcoin miners have inadvertently become a key part of the AI infrastructure boom. Their most valuable asset is not their hardware but their pre-existing, large-scale energy contracts. AI companies need this power, forcing partnerships that make miners a valuable pick-and-shovel play on AI.

The future of valuable AI lies not in models trained on the abundant public internet, but in those built on scarce, proprietary data. For fields like robotics and biology, this data doesn't exist to be scraped; it must be actively created, making the data generation process itself the key competitive moat.

To achieve scalable autonomy, Flywheel AI avoids expensive, site-specific setups. Instead, they offer a valuable teleoperation service today. This service allows them to profitably collect the vast, diverse datasets required to train a generalizable autonomous system, mirroring Tesla's data collection strategy.

YipitData had data on millions of companies but could only afford to process it for a few hundred public tickers due to high manual cleaning costs. AI and LLMs have now made it economically viable to tag and structure this messy, long-tail data at scale, creating massive new product opportunities.