Unlike first-time founders who struggle for attention, successful repeat founders face the opposite problem. Prospects tend to agree with their ideas due to their reputation, creating 'happy ears' and masking the truth until a payment is requested.
Related Insights
While customer feedback is vital for identifying problems (e.g., 40% of 911 calls are non-urgent), customers rarely envision the best solution (e.g., an AI voice agent). A founder's role is to absorb the problem, then push for the technologically superior solution, even if it initially faces resistance.
The most vitriolic critics of your startup are almost never successful founders. People 'in the arena' understand the struggle and offer constructive feedback. Detractors are often 'in the stands,' tearing others down because they haven't experienced the challenges of building something worthwhile.
Founders and CEOs can develop an inflated sense of their contribution by focusing only on the final executive meeting. They often overlook the months of prospecting, relationship-building, and deal choreography done by the sales rep, leading to unfair perceptions about who truly 'closed the deal.'
While assessed during diligence, the true caliber of a founder—their passion, authenticity, and ability to "run through walls"—becomes starkly clear after the deal closes. This distinction is not subtle; the impact of a truly exceptional founder versus an average one is immediately evident in the business's trajectory.
In initial meetings with enterprise prospects, Nexla's founder didn't pitch a solution. He focused entirely on validating the problem. By asking, "Do you see this problem as well?" he framed the conversation as a collaborative exploration, which disarmed prospects and led to more honest, insightful discussions.
Much online startup advice comes from founders with a single lucky success or a large pre-existing audience, making their advice often not repeatable. Seek guidance from those who have demonstrated success multiple times, proving their methods are based on skill and strategy, not just luck or circumstance.
During validation calls for Merge, prospective customers expressed extreme annoyance with the status quo but were skeptical the founders could technically solve it. This combination was the ultimate signal: the pain was immense, and a successful solution would be highly defensible and valuable.
To truly validate their idea, Moonshot AI's founders deliberately sought negative feedback. This approach of "trying to get the no's" ensures honest market signals, helping them avoid the trap of false positive validation from contacts who are just being polite.
