Much online startup advice comes from founders with a single lucky success or a large pre-existing audience, making their advice often not repeatable. Seek guidance from those who have demonstrated success multiple times, proving their methods are based on skill and strategy, not just luck or circumstance.
Related Insights
Bootstrappers should avoid modeling their processes after companies like Apple or Basecamp, who have near-infinite time and resources. Instead, look to other successful solo founders or small teams who operate under similar constraints for more relevant and applicable strategies.
Value-add isn't a pitch deck slide. Truly helpful investors are either former operators who can empathize with the 0-to-1 struggle, or they actively help you get your first customers. They are the first call in a crisis or the ones who will vouch for you on a reference call when you have no other credibility.
Founders who succeed by randomly trying ideas rather than using a systematic process don't learn repeatable skills. This lucky break can be detrimental, as it validates a flawed strategy and prevents the founder from learning the principles needed for consistent, future success.
VCs with operational backgrounds value execution over credentials. They screen for founders who show an instinct to act and build immediately, such as launching a splash page to test demand, before raising capital. This "dirt under the fingernails" is a stronger signal than pedigree.
Since startups lack infinite time and money, an investor's key diligence question is whether the team can learn and iterate fast enough to find a valuable solution before resources run out. This 'learning velocity' is more important than initial traction or a perfect starting plan.
Chomps' founders learned not to blindly copy the strategies of successful brands. They advise founders to gather wide-ranging feedback but to ultimately analyze it through their own company's unique context, as what works for one brand is not a guarantee of success for another.
Rapid startup success stories are misleading. A company's quick victory is almost always the result of its founder's decade-long journey of grinding, learning, and failing. The compounding effect of skills, credibility, and network building is the true engine behind the breakthrough moment.
Instead of seeking feedback broadly, prioritize 'believability-weighted' input from a community of vetted experts. Knowing the track record, specific expertise, and conviction levels of those offering advice allows you to filter signal from noise and make more informed investment decisions.
Seeing an existing successful business is validation, not a deterrent. By copying their current model, you start where they are today, bypassing their years of risky experimentation and learning. The market is large enough for multiple winners.
