RevOps functions as the "truth-teller" for the revenue engine. To be effective, they need immunity from organizational politics, regardless of their reporting structure. Without it, they're forced to serve a leader's ego to protect their job, which is a recipe for disaster.

Related Insights

Companies mistakenly bundle management with authority, forcing top performers onto a management track to gain influence. Separate them. Define management's role as coordination and context-sharing, allowing senior individual contributors to drive decisions without managing people.

Frontline employees have the most information about customer needs, while leaders have all the authority. To deliver exceptional service, empower the people interacting with customers to make decisions in the moment. This closes the gap and allows the organization to be truly responsive.

The CRO's average tenure is now a mere 18 months, making them an unstable ally for RevOps. To ensure job security and drive impact, RevOps leaders should instead align with the CFO, who has a 7-year tenure, by pitching initiatives with undeniable ROI.

Effective delegation of decision-making authority is impossible without first ensuring leaders are deeply aligned on organizational objectives. When individuals are empowered to make choices but pull in different directions, the result is a quagmire, not progress. Alignment must precede autonomy.

Some CEOs encourage tension between sales and marketing. A more effective model is for the CRO and CMO to build enough trust to handle all disagreements—like lead quality or follow-up—behind closed doors. This prevents a culture of finger-pointing and presents a united front to leadership.

A key, often overlooked, function of leaders in high-growth groups is to act as a shield against internal company interference. This allows their teams to focus on innovation and execution rather than navigating organizational friction, which is a primary driver of top talent attrition.

To avoid biased prioritization, structure Marketing Ops as an independent unit rather than placing it under Demand Gen or a sales-led RevOps team. This allows Mops to be a neutral hub, prioritizing projects based on their impact on total company revenue, not just one department's goals.

Don't be afraid to surface problems to executives, as their job is almost entirely focused on what's not working. Withholding a problem is unhelpful; clarifying and framing it is incredibly valuable. Your champion isn't offending their boss by raising an issue, they're demonstrating strategic awareness.

The CMO role has shifted from a top-down "ivory tower" approver to a servant leader. The primary goal is to create an environment of psychological safety where even the most junior person can say, "I think you got it wrong," which ultimately leads to bolder and better ideas.

To scale an empire, you must separate emotional relationships from business operations. This means implementing checks and balances, like having a third party review a trusted partner's work, not as a sign of distrust but as a standard, unemotional practice. This protects the business from the inherent vulnerabilities of personal feelings.

RevOps Professionals Need "Diplomatic Immunity" to Serve the Business, Not Egos | RiffOn