Go beyond analyzing the founding team by treating the entire employee base as a key asset. By measuring metrics like employee retention rates, hiring velocity, and geographical or role-based growth, investors can build a quantitative picture of a company's health and culture, providing a powerful comparative tool.

The market capitalization of the world's largest companies is overwhelmingly derived from non-physical assets like brand, intellectual property, and customer goodwill. Selling all of Coca-Cola's factories would yield far less value than retaining ownership of the name alone, proving that intangible meaning is the primary driver of modern enterprise value.

Temasek evaluates global investments on two fronts: financial returns and the strategic insights they generate. This "network effect" allows them to transfer knowledge from one portfolio company to others, enhancing value across their entire ecosystem and justifying investments beyond pure financial metrics.

To prove brand's financial impact, connect it to the three core levers of Customer Lifetime Value (CLV). A strong brand lowers customer acquisition costs, increases retention, and supports higher margins through pricing power. Since aggregate CLV is tied to firm valuation, this makes brand's contribution tangible to a CFO.

Former AB InBev CMO Chris Burgrave argues that brand building is a financial activity, not just a marketing one. A brand's ultimate purpose is to de-risk a business by creating repeatable, predictable future cash flows. This reframes the conversation from soft metrics to tangible financial outcomes like growth, profit, and risk reduction.

To overcome accounting's focus on historical costs, quantitative investors use unstructured data from sources like patent filings, trademarks, and LinkedIn profiles. This approach quantifies the actual output and quality of a company's intellectual property and human capital.

Traditional valuation multiples are increasingly misleading because GAAP rules expense intangible investments (R&D, brand building) rather than capitalizing them. For a company like Microsoft, properly capitalizing these investments can drop its P/E ratio from 35 to 30, revealing a more attractive valuation.

Adjusting financial statements to capitalize R&D provides a more accurate book value for tech firms. However, this input-based approach is limited, as the value of an intangible asset, like a successful drug patent, is non-linear and disconnected from its historical cost.

Companies investing heavily in intangibles like R&D often see a temporary drop in earnings per share (EPS). This spending, however, builds long-term competitive advantages and moats, leading to substantial EPS growth over a multi-year horizon.