The team conducts immediate "hot debriefs" for quick learning within a thick-skinned culture focused on improvement, not blame. "Cold debriefs" happen later, allowing emotions to cool for more strategic conversations after a high-pressure event.

Related Insights

Jensen Huang rejects "praise publicly, criticize privately." He criticizes publicly so the entire organization can learn from one person's mistake, optimizing for company-wide learning over individual comfort and avoiding political infighting.

A 'blame and shame' culture develops when all bad outcomes are punished equally, chilling employee reporting. To foster psychological safety, leaders must distinguish between unintentional mistakes (errors) and conscious violations (choices). A just response to each builds a culture where people feel safe admitting failures.

Leadership coach Denise Blank suggests using non-judgmental metaphors from nature (e.g., 'stuck in an eddy,' 'at a cross current') to describe conflict patterns. This allows teams to address the dynamic itself without blaming individuals, fostering curiosity and collaboration instead of defensiveness.

Instead of stigmatizing failure, LEGO embeds a formal "After Action Review" (AAR) process into its culture, with reviews happening daily at some level. This structured debrief forces teams to analyze why a project failed and apply those specific learnings across the organization to prevent repeat mistakes.

Intuition is not a mystical gut feeling but rapid pattern recognition based on experience. Since leaders cannot "watch game tape," they must build this mental library by systematically discussing failures and setbacks. This process of embedding learnings sharpens their ability to recognize patterns in future situations.

When giving feedback, structure it in three parts. "What" is the specific observation. "So what" explains its impact on you or the situation. "Now what" provides a clear, forward-looking suggestion for change. This framework ensures feedback is understood and actionable.

To prevent resentment in high-pressure teams, implement a scheduled forum for fearless feedback, like a "Sunday SmackDown." This creates a predictable, safe container for airing grievances—personal or professional. By separating critique from daily operations, it allows team members to be open and constructive without the awkwardness or fear of disrupting morale, thereby preventing small issues from escalating.

Borrowing from filmmaking, view communication slip-ups not as failures but as different "takes." This reframes errors as opportunities to try a different approach next time, reducing fear and encouraging experimentation and growth.

Instead of dwelling on what went wrong, anchor coaching in the future ('feed forward') by planning for the next opportunity. Reinforcing positive actions with 'highlight reels,' like coach Tom Landry did, is far more effective at encouraging repeat performance than only analyzing fumbles.

If an employee makes an error while following your instructions, the instructions are flawed, not the employee. This approach shifts the focus from penalizing individuals to improving systems. It creates a better training process and a psychologically safe culture that values feedback.