To combat self-inflicted setbacks, HubSpot created a "Pothole Report." When a metric blew up (like support wait times), they identified the leading indicators they missed. These indicators were then added to a comprehensive report, reviewed monthly, to prevent the same issue from recurring.
Related Insights
A CEO overseeing 40 general managers replaced monthly operating reviews with 20-minute video updates. He feeds the transcripts into a custom AI agent trained on the company playbook to instantly identify key issues and revenue shortfalls. This transforms the review process from data gathering to rapid problem-solving.
Board reports often highlight positive top-line growth (e.g., "deals are up 25%") while ignoring underlying process flaws. This "fluff" reporting hides massive inefficiencies, like an abysmal lead-to-deal conversion rate, preventing the business from addressing the root causes of waste and suboptimal performance.
Before investing in complex system instrumentation, use simple surveys to get a quick baseline of developer experience. Ask engineers to name their top three productivity blockers. This provides immediate, high-signal data to prioritize where to focus deeper data collection efforts.
Vague "closed-lost" reasons like 'budget' or 'timing' often lead to sales blaming marketing. A "close loss audit" filters CRM data for these reasons to quantify revenue lost to the status quo, creating a shared enemy for both teams to rally against instead of fighting each other.
When growth stalls, blaming a broad area like 'sales' is ineffective. A simple weekly scorecard forces founders to drill down into specific metrics like lead volume vs. conversion rate. This pinpoints the actual operational drag, turning a large, unsolvable problem into a focused, actionable one.
Metrics like product utilization, ROI, or customer happiness (NPS) are often correlated with retention but don't cause it. Focusing on these proxies wastes energy. Instead, identify the one specific event (e.g., a team sending 2,000 Slack messages) that causally leads to non-churn.
To drive data discipline, a RevOps leader should consistently review a core set of metrics with the executive team. This forces their own team to come prepared with answers. This scrutiny trickles down, as sales leaders learn which metrics matter and begin proactively reviewing them with their own business partners.
Instead of stigmatizing failure, LEGO embeds a formal "After Action Review" (AAR) process into its culture, with reviews happening daily at some level. This structured debrief forces teams to analyze why a project failed and apply those specific learnings across the organization to prevent repeat mistakes.
When problems like missed forecasts or high churn recur quarterly, the issue isn't an underperforming team (e.g., sales or CS). It's a systemic problem. Finger-pointing at individual departments masks deeper issues in cross-functional alignment, ICP definition, or process handoffs that require a holistic diagnosis.
For a small team, solving customer problems reactively is a trap. It drains irreplaceable time and energy, often in service of non-ideal customers, which unintentionally creates more systemic issues. A proactive, ICP-driven approach is the only sustainable path when you lack the resources to constantly fight fires.
