A company's top German engineer admitted he felt "like a child" and began to withdraw after English became the mandatory business language. This reveals a critical risk: a lingua franca policy without support can silence top talent, leading to a culture where the loudest are heard, not the most competent.
When working in complex organizations like the UN or federal government, don't try to master their internal language. Instead, find and partner with internal experts who can translate your goals into the organization's native operating system to achieve impact.
A cultural shift towards top-down management, where engineers were no longer part of key decisions like moving to the cloud, led to a mass exodus of senior talent. When senior ICs cannot stand behind leadership's decisions, they lose the motivation to stay, even if the pay is good.
With non-native speakers as the majority of English users, the language constantly evolves in diverse ways globally. Efforts to impose a simplified, standard version for business (like "globish") are unlikely to succeed because language is a living system that speakers inherently and creatively adapt, making it impossible to control.
Leaders focus on obvious cultural differences like language. However, the divide between departments in the same organization (e.g., military vs. State Department) can be larger and more insidious because it’s less apparent, leading to misinterpretation rooted in different organizational norms and assumptions.
Meta's strategy of poaching top AI talent and isolating them in a secretive, high-status lab created a predictable culture clash. By failing to account for the resentment from legacy employees, the company sparked internal conflict, demands for raises, and departures, demonstrating a classic management failure of prioritizing talent acquisition over cultural integration.
Culture isn't an abstract value statement. It's the sum of concrete behaviors you enforce, like fining partners for being late to meetings. These specific actions, not words, define your organization's true character and priorities.
A lack of cross-cultural interaction outside of work creates professional blind spots. Managers may innocently misinterpret unfamiliar communication styles or slang as a lack of talent or initiative, undermining efforts to build diverse and inclusive teams.
Your culture isn't what's on the walls; it's defined by the worst behavior you allow. Firing a high-performing but toxic employee sends a more powerful message about your values than any mission statement. Upholding standards for everyone, especially top talent, is non-negotiable for a strong culture.
When a team has members from 10+ countries, country-specific 'do's and don'ts' are useless. The effective strategy is developing broad cultural intelligence: slowing down, listening more than talking, and using inquiry to ensure mutual understanding with any colleague, regardless of their origin.
When employees feel excluded, the consequence isn't just passive disengagement. It can breed resentment that leads them to withhold crucial ideas, watch things fail without intervening, or even actively work against the organization's interests. Exclusion creates a tangible cost and risk.