Complex documents like evaluation strategies are rarely read beforehand. To ensure alignment, adopt the Amazon practice of dedicating the first 15-20 minutes of a kickoff meeting to silent, focused reading. This forces engagement and leads to a more informed and productive discussion.
Related Insights
The common failure of "pre-read" meetings is that attendees don't do the reading. Atlassian, like Amazon, solves this by starting decision-making meetings with a dedicated, silent period where everyone reads the context document together. This guarantees shared context and makes the subsequent discussion far more effective.
Some Amazon meetings begin with silent, independent reading of a preparatory memo. After reading and adding notes, participants who have no further contribution are encouraged to leave. This respects individuals' time and ensures that only those essential for the synchronous discussion remain.
Don't mistake silence for agreement. Assume quiet participants are potential blockers with unspoken opinions. Call on them directly, acknowledge their specific role, and create a safe space for them to contribute. Their perspective, often critical, will surface after the call if not addressed.
An effective meeting has three parts: 1) "Navy SEAL" for strict accountability against goals, 2) "Suspense Thriller" for debating a strategic topic with an unknown outcome (using a pre-read memo), and 3) "Pep Rally" for authentically celebrating wins to boost morale.
Arvind Jain insists on receiving written thoughts before discussions. It's partly for his own processing style (he absorbs information better by reading). More importantly, he believes the act of writing is the most effective way for anyone to structure their thoughts coherently and make better strategic decisions.
Go beyond using AI for research by codifying your North Star, OKRs, and strategic goals into a personalized AI agent. Before important meetings, use this agent as a 'thought partner' to pressure-test your ideas, check for alignment with your goals, and identify blind spots. This 10-minute exercise dramatically improves meeting focus and outcomes.
To prevent the first or most senior person from anchoring a conversation, collect everyone's independent analysis in writing first. Only after this information is aggregated should the group discussion begin. This method ensures a wider range of ideas is considered and prevents premature consensus.
Adopt the private equity board meeting model: circulate a detailed brief a week in advance. This forces attendees to consume updates asynchronously. The meeting itself can then be dedicated entirely to debating critical, forward-looking decisions instead of wasting time on status reports.
Instead of using meetings for context-setting, Loom’s team sends a required 'pre-watch' video walkthrough of the strategy. This forces stakeholders to arrive with full context, allowing the live meeting to be shorter and entirely focused on critique, asking clarifying questions, and making decisions.
Instead of a top-down agenda, Brad Jacobs has his leadership team collaboratively create it for key meetings. Attendees submit and rank questions based on pre-read materials. Only the highest-rated topics make the final agenda. This bottom-up approach ensures the meeting focuses on what the team collectively deems most critical.
