South Park's creators use a simple rule: if you can connect your story beats with "and then," you have a boring list of events. If you must use "but" or "so," you have a compelling narrative of cause and effect. This creates unresolved tension and keeps the audience engaged.
Related Insights
To convey necessary but dull information, use a storytelling technique where a captivating but unrelated action occurs in the background. The viewer's attention is held by the background activity, making them passively absorb the primary, more "boring" message in the foreground.
The ultimate test of a sales story isn't engagement, but whether it prompts the customer to take a specific next step. When debriefing a sales call, if no action was secured or the prospect doesn't ask follow-up questions, you should assume your story failed to connect and was not relatable.
Storytelling frameworks are useless without substance. The foundation of a compelling narrative is knowing more about your industry's core problem than anyone else. The goal isn't to master abstract techniques but to develop a deep, unique perspective that you feel compelled to share. The true test: could you write a book on your category?
A story's core mechanic for engagement is not just emotion, but the constant betrayal of the audience's expectations. People are drawn to narratives, jokes, and songs precisely because they want their predictions about what happens next to be wrong. This element of surprise is what makes a story satisfying and compels an audience to continue.
At Alphabet's X, the primary role of storytelling isn't marketing but creating an 'architecture of understanding.' A compelling narrative must lay out a plausible, step-by-step path to the goal. This provides a clear hypothesis and a set of milestones that the team can then systematically test and disprove.
The book title "Make Brilliant Work" is forgettable, while "Steal Like an Artist" is compelling because it contains a conflict—artists are supposed to be original, not thieves. This principle of juxtaposition can be applied to any writing by introducing opposing ideas to create immediate tension and capture attention.
The "features vs. benefits" debate is a false dichotomy. Great messaging, like fiction writing, uses "narrative distance" to strategically zoom in on details (features) and zoom out to the big picture (outcomes). This creates a complete story and avoids getting stuck at one extreme.
Stories are more than just engaging content; they are the most powerful form of proof. A story acts as a 'dramatic demonstration' of your point, showing rather than telling. Since customers buy based on proof, not promises, storytelling is a non-confrontational way to build credibility and drive sales.
Every compelling story needs conflict, which requires an enemy. Companies can define their enemy in one of three ways: direct competitors (e.g., other vodkas), competing approaches (e.g., cycling vs. the tube), or beliefs you stand against (e.g., humans are terrible drivers). This ABC framework (Approaches, Beliefs, Competitors) simplifies narrative creation.
When writing his book, Steve Garrity hired a developmental editor who did more than proofread. The editor cut 40% of the text and restructured the entire story to begin at the emotional low point, rather than chronologically. This highlights that an editor's greatest value can be in re-architecting the narrative for maximum impact.
