High-achievers often subconsciously avoid giving their absolute all to a project. This creates a built-in excuse if it fails ("I didn't really try my hardest"). This self-protection mechanism becomes a form of self-rejection, preventing you from reaching your true potential.

Related Insights

High-achievers often burn out by over-investing emotionally, driven by an intense internal definition of success. To break this cycle, get external input from stakeholders. Their definition of "good enough" is often more reasonable and can help you recalibrate your own success metrics and boundaries.

Unlike healthy ambition, toxic perfectionism isn't about achieving great things. It's a maladaptive strategy driven by a core belief of being flawed and defective, aiming to "repair" the self to feel worthy and accepted. The motivation is to fix a perceived internal deficit, not to push oneself toward external goals.

The key differentiator for top performers is that their mind overrules their feelings. Feelings suggest quitting, offer excuses, and lead to overthinking. A strong mind makes a decision and executes, driving resilience and action despite emotional resistance or doubt.

Perfectionists believe achievement will solve their core feeling of unworthiness, but it's a fantasy. Success provides fleeting relief at best and is often dismissed, while failure powerfully confirms their deepest fears of inadequacy. This creates a self-perpetuating cycle where the only possible outcomes are neutral or negative.

“Giving yourself grace” is not an excuse for poor effort. It is a post-performance strategy. Uphold a high standard in your work, but apply grace in the evaluation by learning from mistakes without obsessive self-criticism, which prevents you from backing away after a setback.

While psychology warns against tying your identity to your work to avoid pain from failure, high performers do exactly that. They embrace identities like "I am a writer" because this personal attachment makes excellence non-negotiable and prevents them from simply "going through the motions."

Known as "perfectionistic self-preservation," this paradoxical behavior is driven by the logic that you can't truly fail at something you didn't try. To avoid the intense shame of failing at full effort, perfectionists will procrastinate or underperform intentionally.

The perfectionist mindset is so entrenched that it can re-interpret clear victories as evidence of failure. Achieving a top grade, for example, is seen not as a success but as proof of inadequacy because of the effort required. The goalposts constantly shift to protect the core belief of being flawed.

Striving for perfection consumes cognitive bandwidth with self-monitoring and judgment. By lowering the stakes and focusing on connection instead, you free up mental resources, paradoxically leading to better performance and achieving greatness.

The belief that perfectionism drives success is a myth. Research shows perfectionistic individuals often have lower income and productivity. The fear of not being perfect leads to paralysis and interferes with performance, contrasting with healthy "excellencism," which is adaptive and focuses on striving rather than flaw-avoidance.