When evaluating AI startups, don't just consider the current product landscape. Instead, visualize the future state of giants like OpenAI as multi-trillion dollar companies. Their "sphere of influence" will be vast. The best opportunities are "second-order" companies operating in niches these giants are unlikely to touch.

Fal strategically chose not to compete in LLM inference against giants like OpenAI and Google. Instead, they focused on the "net new market" of generative media (images, video), allowing them to become a leader in a fast-growing, less contested space.

While known for its GPUs, NVIDIA's true competitive moat is CUDA, a free software platform that made its hardware accessible for diverse applications like research and AI. This created a powerful network effect and stickiness that competitors struggled to replicate, making NVIDIA more of a software company than observers realize.

Cramer's conviction in NVIDIA wasn't from a balance sheet. His "edge" came from privileged access at NVIDIA HQ, where CEO Jensen Huang personally demonstrated generative AI capabilities—like creating Cezanne-style paintings and AI clones—years before the technology became mainstream. This firsthand experience provided a unique informational advantage.

Fal strategically focused on generative media over LLMs, identifying it as a "net new" market. They reasoned that LLM inference directly competed with Google's core search business—a fight an incumbent would win at all costs. The emergent media market lacked a dominant player, creating a perfect greenfield opportunity for a startup to lead and define.

Instead of competing for market share, Jensen Huang focuses on creating entirely new markets where there are initially "no customers." This "zero-billion-dollar market" strategy ensures there are also no competitors, allowing NVIDIA to build a dominant position from scratch.

Large platforms focus on massive opportunities right in front of them ('gold bricks at their feet'). They consciously ignore even valuable markets that require more effort ('gold bricks 100 feet away'). This strategic neglect creates defensible spaces for startups in those niche areas.

When evaluating revolutionary ideas, traditional Total Addressable Market (TAM) analysis is useless. VCs should instead bet on founders with a "world-bending vision" capable of inducing a new market, not just capturing an existing one. Have the humility to admit you can't predict market size and instead back the visionary founder.

Conventional venture capital wisdom of 'winner-take-all' may not apply to AI applications. The market is expanding so rapidly that it can sustain multiple, fast-growing, highly valuable companies, each capturing a significant niche. For VCs, this means huge returns don't necessarily require backing a monopoly.