Fal strategically focused on generative media over LLMs, identifying it as a "net new" market. They reasoned that LLM inference directly competed with Google's core search business—a fight an incumbent would win at all costs. The emergent media market lacked a dominant player, creating a perfect greenfield opportunity for a startup to lead and define.
Related Insights
Fal's competitive advantage lies in the operational complexity of hosting 600+ different AI models simultaneously. While competitors may optimize a single marquee model, Fal built sophisticated systems for elastic scaling, multi-datacenter caching, and GPU utilization across diverse architectures. This ability to efficiently manage variety at scale creates a deep technical moat.
When evaluating AI startups, don't just consider the current product landscape. Instead, visualize the future state of giants like OpenAI as multi-trillion dollar companies. Their "sphere of influence" will be vast. The best opportunities are "second-order" companies operating in niches these giants are unlikely to touch.
Unlike cloud or mobile, which incumbents initially ignored, AI adoption is consensus. Startups can't rely on incumbents being slow. The new 'white space' for disruption exists in niche markets large companies still deem too small to enter.
Fal strategically chose not to compete in LLM inference against giants like OpenAI and Google. Instead, they focused on the "net new market" of generative media (images, video), allowing them to become a leader in a fast-growing, less contested space.
While today's focus is on text-based LLMs, the true, defensible AI battleground will be in complex modalities like video. Generating video requires multiple interacting models and unique architectures, creating far greater potential for differentiation and a wider competitive moat than text-based interfaces, which will become commoditized.
Fal treats every new model launch on its platform as a full-fledged marketing event. Rather than just a technical update, each release becomes an opportunity to co-market with research labs, create social buzz, and provide sales with a fresh reason to engage prospects. This strategy turns the rapid pace of AI innovation into a predictable and repeatable growth engine.
Startups are becoming wary of building on OpenAI's platform due to the significant risk of OpenAI launching competing applications (e.g., Sora for video), rendering their products obsolete. This "platform risk" is pushing developers toward neutral providers like Anthropic or open-source models to protect their businesses.
Large platforms focus on massive opportunities right in front of them ('gold bricks at their feet'). They consciously ignore even valuable markets that require more effort ('gold bricks 100 feet away'). This strategic neglect creates defensible spaces for startups in those niche areas.
If a company and its competitor both ask a generic LLM for strategy, they'll get the same answer, erasing any edge. The only way to generate unique, defensible strategies is by building evolving models trained on a company's own private data.
Investing in startups directly adjacent to OpenAI is risky, as they will inevitably build those features. A smarter strategy is backing "second-order effect" companies applying AI to niche, unsexy industries that are outside the core focus of top AI researchers.