Smaller public companies holding Bitcoin have failed to replicate MicroStrategy's success. Their model depends on Bitcoin's price rising consistently to allow for more debt issuance and acquisitions. The recent sideways market has broken this flywheel, collapsing their valuations into 'Bitcoin penny stocks.'

Drawing parallels to closed-end funds, Berkshire Hathaway, and well-managed banks, analyst Andy Edstrom argues against high MNAV (multiple of net asset value) multiples for Bitcoin treasury companies. Historical precedent suggests these firms should trade between a slight discount (0.8x) and a modest premium (2-2.5x MNAV), not the extreme valuations seen previously.

A proposed mental model frames MicroStrategy's issuance of preferred stock as analogous to Tether issuing stablecoins. Instead of using treasuries, MSTR uses heavily over-collateralized Bitcoin (e.g., 5-to-1 ratio) to create a yield-bearing, dollar-denominated instrument, effectively securitizing its Bitcoin holdings to generate returns for equity holders.

By creating a regulatory framework that requires private stablecoins to be backed 1-to-1 by U.S. Treasuries, the government can prop up demand for its ever-increasing debt. This strategy is less about embracing financial innovation and more about extending the U.S. dollar's lifespan as the global reserve currency.

To understand the crypto landscape, categorize assets by function. Bitcoin's primary role is a neutral, hard money store of value—like digital gold. Ethereum acts as a programmable settlement layer for stablecoins, tokenized assets, and AI agents—making it the system's digital oil.

Technologies like AI and robotics create massive deflationary pressures. To counteract this, governments will be forced to print more fiat currency, debasing it. This macro environment makes a scarce, decentralized asset like Bitcoin a critical tool for corporations to preserve capital and protect their balance sheets from inflation.

Maja Vujinovic posits that Gary Gensler, despite his pro-crypto past, was strategically positioned by banks to slow innovation. This regulatory friction gave traditional financial institutions the necessary time to understand the technology and formulate their own digital asset strategies before competing.

An investor's Bitcoin thesis rests on three pillars: 1) as a self-custodied asset for debanking/borderless scenarios, 2) as an investment for pure price appreciation ("number go up"), and 3) as an ethical holding to support a better financial system. This framework clarifies why proxies like MSTR satisfy the latter two needs but never the first.

For stablecoin companies like Tether seeking legitimacy in the US market, the simplest path is to back their assets with US treasuries. This aligns their interests with the US government, turning a potential adversary into a welcome buyer of national debt, even if it means lower returns compared to riskier assets.