Maja Vujinovic posits that Gary Gensler, despite his pro-crypto past, was strategically positioned by banks to slow innovation. This regulatory friction gave traditional financial institutions the necessary time to understand the technology and formulate their own digital asset strategies before competing.
Related Insights
The CEO of Africa's largest bank states they strategically avoid being on the cutting edge. This "fast follower" approach allows them to adopt proven innovations responsibly while avoiding the high costs and risks of being a pioneer.
By creating a regulatory framework that requires private stablecoins to be backed 1-to-1 by U.S. Treasuries, the government can prop up demand for its ever-increasing debt. This strategy is less about embracing financial innovation and more about extending the U.S. dollar's lifespan as the global reserve currency.
Widespread adoption of blockchain, particularly stablecoins, has been hindered by a "semi-illegal" regulatory environment in the U.S. (e.g., Operation Chokepoint). Now that this barrier is removed, major financial players are racing to integrate the technology, likely making it common within a year.
The US administration criticized Brazil's wildly successful instant-payment system, PIX, for harming companies like Visa. This stance reveals how deeply entrenched financial incumbents have captured US policy, actively resisting innovation that has made payments faster and cheaper in many other developed countries.
While fast-moving, unregulated competitors like FTX garner hype, a deliberate, compliance-first approach builds a more resilient and defensible business in sectors like finance. This unsexy path is the key to building a lasting, mainstream company with a strong regulatory moat.
The US banking system is technologically behind countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America. This inefficiency stems from a protected regulatory environment that fosters a status quo. In contrast, markets like the UK have implemented fintech-friendly charters, enabling innovators like Revolut to thrive.
In a novel attempt to delay a debt crisis, policymakers are pushing for regulations that would force stablecoin issuers to back their digital dollars one-to-one with U.S. Treasuries. This cleverly creates a new, captive international market for government debt, helping to prop up the system.
Libra's failure was not technical. The U.S. government intentionally blocked it, recognizing stablecoins as a way to extend the dollar's global dominance. It refused to let a private company control this new financial power, especially with a multi-currency basket.
A regulatory settlement forced crypto firms to pay "rewards" instead of "interest" on stablecoins. Coinbase is exploiting this semantic difference to offer a 4% yield, creating a product that functions like a high-yield checking account but without the traditional banking regulatory burdens. This is a backdoor disruption of consumer banking.
The high profits enjoyed by stablecoin issuers like Tether and Circle are temporary. Major financial institutions (Visa, JPMorgan) will eventually launch their own stablecoins, not as primary profit centers, but as low-cost tools to acquire and retain customers. This will drive margins down for the entire industry.
