We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
For 20 years, Ted Seides never debriefed his own performance as an interviewer. Only when forced to listen to his podcast recordings did he create a feedback loop and improve his craft, highlighting a common blind spot for professionals who conduct interviews.
Professional allocators rarely receive feedback on their ability to question managers. Ted Seides found that hosting a podcast, which requires listening to and editing his own interviews, created an invaluable feedback loop that dramatically improved his information-gathering and due diligence skills.
Encouragement feels good, but it doesn't foster growth. Actively seek out harsh, detailed feedback from trusted sources. Eight pages of notes on why a script "sucks" is more valuable than a hundred compliments because it provides a clear, actionable roadmap for improvement and accelerates your progress.
Many reps know their calls are recorded for managers, but few take the initiative to self-assess their performance. Top performers proactively review their own "game film" to identify areas for improvement, rather than passively waiting for feedback from their coach.
Host Ted Seides initially created long lists of detailed questions, but found it made him focus on his script instead of listening to answers. This caused him to miss obvious follow-up questions, proving that a rigid script can be a liability.
There is an inverse correlation between self-assessed communication skill and actual ability. Those who confidently label themselves "super communicators" often lack the self-monitoring necessary for improvement. Truly effective communicators are those who constantly analyze their interactions and worry about being better.
Many professionals avoid video because they dislike watching themselves. Instead of ignoring this discomfort, lean into it. Methodically re-watching your videos is the fastest way to identify and correct awkward delivery quirks, like repetitive blinking or verbal tics. This self-analysis is a critical step to becoming a more polished presenter.
To get the most out of recording yourself, review it three separate times. First, listen without video to focus on your tone, pace, and filler words. Second, watch without sound to analyze body language and posture. Finally, watch with sound to see the complete picture. This isolates variables for more effective feedback.
People often give vague praise when asked a general question like, "Any feedback?" To get useful critiques, ask for specific input on an area you're developing (e.g., "What's one thing I could do to make this meeting more effective?"). This lowers the social barrier and generates actionable advice.
Author Kate Hall suggests creating an anonymous feedback channel. While it attracts some trolls, it also provides unfiltered, honest feedback on professional and personal blind spots that close colleagues might be hesitant to share directly, leading to profound self-awareness.
To overcome personal bias during a review, frame your challenge as a problem a client is facing and ask, "What advice would I give them?" This mental shift enables rigorous honesty and clearer, more actionable solutions for your own performance issues, bypassing ego and excuses.