The traditional, linear handoff from product (PRDs) to design to dev is too slow for AI's rapid iteration cycles. Leading companies merge these roles into smaller, senior teams where design and product deliver functional prototypes directly to engineering, collapsing the feedback loop and accelerating development.
AI will make the traditional "product pod" structure obsolete for design. Designers, empowered to learn contexts faster and cover more ground, will operate in a more fluid, centralized team. They will be deployed across entire user journeys that span multiple teams, rather than being calcified within a single product area.
AI's productivity gains mean that on a lean, early-stage team, there is little room for purely specialized roles. According to founder Drew Wilson, every team member, including designers, must be able to contribute directly to the codebase. The traditional "design artifact" workflow is too slow.
Dylan Field predicts that AI tools will blur the lines between design, engineering, and product management. Instead of siloed functions, teams will consist of 'product builders' who can contribute across domains but maintain a deep craft in one area. Design becomes even more critical in this new world.
The traditional, linear handoff from product spec to design to code is collapsing. Roles and stages are blurring, with interactive prototypes replacing static documents and the design file itself becoming the central place for the entire team to align and collaborate.
In AI, low prototyping costs and customer uncertainty make the traditional research-first PM model obsolete. The new approach is to build a prototype quickly, show it to customers to discover possibilities, and then iterate based on their reactions, effectively building the solution before the problem is fully defined.
The traditional tech team structure of separate product, engineering, and design roles is becoming obsolete. AI startups favor small teams of 'polymaths'—T-shaped builders who can contribute across disciplines. This shift values broad, hands-on capability over deep specialization for most early-stage roles.
At OpenAI, the development cycle is accelerated by a practice called "vibe coding." Designers and PMs build functional prototypes directly with AI tools like Codex. This visual, interactive method is often faster and more effective for communicating ideas than writing traditional product specifications.
AI co-pilots have accelerated engineering velocity to the point where traditional design-led workflows are now the slowest part of product development. In response, some agile teams are flipping the process, having engineers build a functional prototype first and then creating formal Figma designs and UI polish later.
Traditional agile development, despite its intent, still involves handoffs between research, design, and engineering which create opportunities for misinterpretation. AI tools collapse this sequential process, allowing a single person to move from idea to interactive prototype in minutes, keeping human judgment and creativity tightly coupled.
The traditional "assembly line" model of product development (PM -> Design -> Eng) fails with AI. Instead, teams must operate like a "jazz band," where roles are fluid, members "riff" off each other's work, and territorialism is a failure mode. PMs might code and designers might write specs.