The traditional, linear handoff from product spec to design to code is collapsing. Roles and stages are blurring, with interactive prototypes replacing static documents and the design file itself becoming the central place for the entire team to align and collaborate.

Related Insights

Vercel's Pranati Perry explains that tools like V0 occupy a new space between static design (Figma) and development. They enable designers and PMs to create interactive prototypes that better communicate intent, supplement PRDs, and explore dynamic states without requiring full engineering resources.

Dylan Field predicts that AI tools will blur the lines between design, engineering, and product management. Instead of siloed functions, teams will consist of 'product builders' who can contribute across domains but maintain a deep craft in one area. Design becomes even more critical in this new world.

Instead of siloing roles, encourage engineers to design and designers to code. This cross-functional approach breaks down artificial barriers and helps the entire team think more holistically about the end-to-end user experience, as a real user does not see these internal divisions.

The current model of separate design files and codebases is inefficient. Future tools will enable designers to directly manipulate production code through a visual canvas, eliminating the handoff process and creating a single, shared source of truth for the entire team.

Product Requirement Documents (PRDs) are often written and then ignored. AI-generated prototypes change this dynamic by serving as powerful internal communication tools. Putting an interactive model in front of engineering and design teams sparks better, more tangible conversations and ideas than a flat document ever could.

For complex features, a 17-page requirements document is inefficient for alignment. An interactive AI-generated prototype allows stakeholders to see and use the product, making it a more effective source of truth for gathering feedback and defining requirements than static documentation.

A prototype-first culture, accelerated by AI tools, allows teams to surface and resolve design and workflow conflicts early. At Webflow, designers were asked to 'harmonize' their separate prototypes, preventing a costly integration problem that would have been much harder to fix later in the development cycle.

AI tools are collapsing the traditional moats around design, engineering, and product. As PMs and engineers gain design capabilities, designers must reciprocate by learning to code and, more importantly, taking on strategic business responsibilities to maintain their value and influence.

Traditional agile development, despite its intent, still involves handoffs between research, design, and engineering which create opportunities for misinterpretation. AI tools collapse this sequential process, allowing a single person to move from idea to interactive prototype in minutes, keeping human judgment and creativity tightly coupled.

The traditional "assembly line" model of product development (PM -> Design -> Eng) fails with AI. Instead, teams must operate like a "jazz band," where roles are fluid, members "riff" off each other's work, and territorialism is a failure mode. PMs might code and designers might write specs.