Instead of focusing on individual motivation, leaders should first examine the surrounding environment. The most powerful question isn't about fixing people, but about changing the system to make desired behaviors the easiest and most logical choice for any employee in that role.

Exceptional people in flawed systems will produce subpar results. Before focusing on individual performance, leaders must ensure the underlying systems are reliable and resilient. As shown by the Southwest Airlines software meltdown, blaming employees for systemic failures masks the root cause and prevents meaningful improvement.

During organizational change, insecurity triggers employees' primal threat response, leading to dysfunctional behaviors like resistance. Executives often misinterpret this as the employee being weak or lazy, when it is actually a high-performer's brain reacting to a perceived threat to their stability.

Instead of blaming individuals for errors, leaders should analyze the systemic conditions that led to the mistake. Error isn't random; it's a patterned outcome. This shifts the focus from 'fixing people' to designing more resilient systems.

When an employee seems defiant, it's rarely a deliberate act of insubordination. Instead, it's a signal that a request has caused an internal conflict or values mismatch. Leaders should treat this as a cue to investigate the root cause, not to punish the behavior.

View poor performance or difficult behavior as a manifestation of 'feelings overpowering skills,' rather than a conscious bad choice. This transforms a leader's role from a disciplinarian to a coach focused on teaching the missing skills to manage the situation.

Citing family systems psychology, the individual who appears to be a problem is often just the point where underlying systemic stress and dysfunction surface. Instead of trying to fix or fire the person, leaders should investigate what environmental or process issues are causing their behavior.

A risk-averse employee isn't the root problem; they are a symptom. Their mindset has been shaped by a culture or process that punishes failure or embarrassment. To change the mindset, leaders must first fix the underlying systemic issues.

Before labeling a team as not resilient, leaders should first examine their own expectations. Often, what appears as a lack of resilience is a natural reaction to systemic issues like overwork, underpayment, and inadequate support, making it a leadership problem, not an employee one.