Investors in large acquisitions, like the EA deal, are mercenaries who operate based on spreadsheets, not a love for the product. They analyze future revenue streams, like mobile microtransactions, and are "leading from behind" by monetizing proven user behavior, not innovating from the front.

Tucker Carlson argues that legacy media brands have lost their power to shape public opinion. Their value is now primarily brand recognition, not their content's impact. True cultural influence has shifted to decentralized, creator-driven platforms like YouTube and X.

High-stakes bidding for legacy media assets like Warner Bros. is driven by status-seeking among the ultra-wealthy, not a sound bet on the future of media. They are acquiring prestigious "shiny objects" from the past, while the actual attention economy has shifted to platforms like TikTok and YouTube.

Large media companies are slow to adopt new platforms like Substack. However, once one major player makes a move (e.g., Bloomberg launching Substacks), it triggers a "fast follow" reaction from competitors. This predictable herd mentality creates strategic windows for creators on those platforms to pursue acquisitions.

The pool of potential media buyers extends beyond traditional media. Any business paying a "toll" to Google or Facebook for customers is a strategic acquirer for a media asset that owns a direct audience in its niche. This reframes media M&A as a CAC-reduction strategy for non-media companies like Uber.

The biggest growth driver is mastering platforms where attention is currently underpriced. Businesses often fail by romanticizing past tactics or obsessing over future trends like the metaverse, completely missing the massive, free opportunity available in the present.

The value of a large, pre-existing audience is decreasing. Powerful platform algorithms are becoming so effective at identifying and distributing high-quality content that a new creator with great material can get significant reach without an established following. This levels the playing field and reduces the incumbent advantage.

The media industry's economics have inverted. The greatest career and financial opportunities are no longer in big-screen cinema but on the smallest screens (mobile). This mental model suggests that professionals' returns on human and financial capital are highest when creating content for mobile-first platforms, not traditional film.

The old investment banking model of mass-emailing a deal to many potential buyers is ineffective for media assets. Selling a media company now requires a custom, hands-on process targeting a handful of highly specific, strategic buyers, as the universe of potential acquirers has shrunk and their needs have changed.