Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

If sales only cares about quota and not feature adoption, new products fail to gain traction. Organizations must create shared, cross-functional goals (e.g., revenue from new features) to ensure all teams are aligned on driving customer value, not just hitting isolated departmental metrics.

Related Insights

When a product improvement is meant to benefit another department (e.g., reduce support tickets), don't just ship it and hope for the best. Create a joint, aligned goal with that department's leader. This ensures they are accountable for accruing the benefit (e.g., reallocating saved capacity) and solidifies your impact.

When scaling rapidly, companies naturally develop departmental silos and a tendency towards small, incremental improvements. These two forces actively work against the bold, cross-functional bets required to reach the next revenue milestone and must be actively fought.

To accelerate progress, distill your company's entire mission into a single, quantifiable "North Star Metric." This focuses every department—from engineering to marketing—on one shared objective, eliminating conflicting priorities and aligning all efforts towards a common definition of success.

When different departments push their own projects onto the sales team, reps get overloaded. To solve this, enablement leaders must shift the focus of every initiative away from departmental priorities and toward a shared customer outcome. This unified goal minimizes internal friction and clarifies what's truly important.

Giving marketing a goal for one stage of the pipeline and sales a goal for another creates friction. Instead, hold all teams accountable for the same end goal (e.g., total pipeline generated), while clarifying how their specific inputs contribute to that outcome.

Misalignment stems from sales and marketing using different numbers and narratives. High-performing organizations treat GTM as a single, unified motion. They focus on seamlessly passing the customer from one stage to the next, prioritizing a collective win over defending individual functional metrics.

The battle over attribution isn't a personality conflict but a systemic issue. It's caused by measuring marketing on MQLs and sales on closed revenue. Unifying both teams under a single, shared revenue goal eliminates this friction and fosters collaboration.

Average teams measure success in functional silos (sales vs. marketing), leading to finger-pointing. Elite teams remove functions from the equation. They focus entirely on the customer's journey, identifying patterns that lead to pipeline and fixing those that don't, regardless of which department "owns" them.

To fight misalignment, use a "metrics one-pager." This exercise visually connects the highest-level business goal (e.g., revenue growth) to the key product metrics that drive it, and then down to specific team initiatives. It creates a clear, hierarchical map that justifies all product work.

Organizing by function (e.g., all sales together) seems efficient but incentivizes teams to optimize their individual metrics, not the company's success. This sub-optimization prevents cross-functional learning and leads to blame games, ultimately harming the entire customer value stream and creating a non-learning organization.

Siloed Departmental KPIs Sabotage Product Launches and Inhibit Growth | RiffOn