Misalignment stems from sales and marketing using different numbers and narratives. High-performing organizations treat GTM as a single, unified motion. They focus on seamlessly passing the customer from one stage to the next, prioritizing a collective win over defending individual functional metrics.

Related Insights

Friction between sales and marketing often stems from using separate definitions for a Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL) and a Sales Qualified Lead (SQL). The most effective approach is to have one unified definition: a potential customer that sales can realistically close. This focuses both teams on the ultimate goal of revenue generation.

Instead of a linear handoff, the "GTM Factory" model tracks sales and marketing as parallel processes. This provides end-to-end visibility, like a manufacturing line, exposing how marketing's ongoing influence throughout the sales cycle compounds with sales activities to accelerate pipeline and improve win rates.

When different departments push their own projects onto the sales team, reps get overloaded. To solve this, enablement leaders must shift the focus of every initiative away from departmental priorities and toward a shared customer outcome. This unified goal minimizes internal friction and clarifies what's truly important.

Most go-to-market challenges, from low conversion rates to departmental friction, can be traced to the handoff process between marketing and sales. Start your diagnosis here to find the root cause of issues like low-quality leads or poor pipeline velocity, not just the symptoms.

To keep growth aligned with product, foster a shared culture where everyone loves the product and customer. This isn't about formal meetings, but a baseline agreement that makes collaboration inherent. When this culture exists, the product team actively seeks marketing's input, creating a unified engine.

Go-to-market success isn't just about high-performing marketing, sales, and CS teams. The true differentiator is the 'connective tissue'—shared ICP definitions, terminology, and smooth handoffs. This alignment across functions, where one team's actions directly impact the next, is where most organizations break down.

The term 'retention team' inherently creates a silo separate from acquisition. A more effective approach is reframing all marketing functions as part of one 'customer team.' This mindset shift focuses everyone on the entire journey, from 'entering the door' to 'staying in the house.'

Average teams measure success in functional silos (sales vs. marketing), leading to finger-pointing. Elite teams remove functions from the equation. They focus entirely on the customer's journey, identifying patterns that lead to pipeline and fixing those that don't, regardless of which department "owns" them.

The primary challenge in implementing ABX is not technology or tactics, but achieving organizational balance. Sales teams often want immediate results, while true ABX is a long-term journey of building trust. Success requires joint goal-setting and flexible GTM strategies between marketing and sales leaders.

Framing a meeting around "alignment" invites defensiveness and departmental finger-pointing. Calling it a "Go-to-Market Meeting" re-centers the conversation on shared business problems like pipeline and retention, fostering collaborative problem-solving instead of blame.