Misalignment stems from sales and marketing using different numbers and narratives. High-performing organizations treat GTM as a single, unified motion. They focus on seamlessly passing the customer from one stage to the next, prioritizing a collective win over defending individual functional metrics.
A motion (e.g., PLG) contributing 20% of revenue might seem successful. However, elite teams analyze its efficiency—the conversion rate and cost to acquire that revenue. A high-cost, low-conversion motion is a significant drain, even if its top-line contribution appears acceptable on paper.
Relying on a single data point like "first touch" to explain pipeline creation is flawed. It ignores the complex buyer journey and inevitably leads to a blame game—marketing providing "shitty leads" versus sales doing "poor follow-up"—instead of a systematic analysis of what is truly broken in the process.
At the "model collapse" stage, there is no middle ground. Working harder within the broken system guarantees failure. A leader's only viable options are to leave the company or to take on the difficult, high-stakes role of championing a complete overhaul of the GTM data and measurement philosophy.
Feeling exhausted from constantly defending your work isn't just burnout; it's a critical turning point. Effective leaders realize the problem isn't their tactics but the underlying data and measurement model itself, prompting a fundamental shift in focus from activity to infrastructure.
Most GTM systems track initial outreach and final outcomes but fail to quantify the critical journey in between. This "ginormous gray area" of engagement makes it impossible to understand which activities truly influence pipeline, leading to flawed, outcome-based decision-making instead of journey-based optimization.
Companies stay stuck in failing models for three reasons: 1) The system rewards controllable but ineffective activity (more calls, more MQLs). 2) Leaders fear the perceived risk of foundational change. 3) A culture of urgency favors quick tactical fixes over addressing deep, systemic issues.
Average teams measure success in functional silos (sales vs. marketing), leading to finger-pointing. Elite teams remove functions from the equation. They focus entirely on the customer's journey, identifying patterns that lead to pipeline and fixing those that don't, regardless of which department "owns" them.