Global economic models for resources like gold or lithium are based on the assumption of a finite supply within Earth's closed system. Introducing a massive new supply from a captured asteroid would shatter this foundational assumption, potentially collapsing markets and rendering all existing economic calculations obsolete overnight.
Related Insights
The goal for a majority-EV fleet is not viable with current technology. The material requirements for batteries and components are so vast that a US-only transition would consume every scrap of lithium, copper, graphite, and other key minerals produced globally, leaving none for any other country or industry.
The potential for an AI-driven, post-capitalist world of abundance is real. However, the path there will likely be as destructive as a world war, as the rapid upending of the economic order will throw society into chaos before stability is achieved.
The most significant long-term threat to the supply of critical materials isn't a lack of resources in the ground, but a lack of people. The aging workforce of geologists and mining engineers, with a shrinking pipeline of new talent, poses a greater systemic risk to the industry.
Gold's historic link to US real yields broke after the US froze Russian reserves. This forced global central banks to reassess risk and buy gold regardless of price, creating a powerful new source of demand and structurally altering the market, a change now being followed by sovereign wealth funds.
Describing space exploration as a 'cash grab' isn't cynical; it's a recognition of fundamental human motivation. Money acts as 'proof of work,' incentivizing people to dedicate time and resources to difficult, long-term goals. Without a profit motive, ambitious endeavors like becoming a multi-planetary species would never attract the necessary capital and talent.
According to economist Robert Solow, the issue with metrics like GDP isn't mismeasurement, but a deliberate choice to exclude factors like natural resource depletion. The system is flawed because we have decided not to measure certain things, which creates a distorted view of economic health.
While media outlets create hype cycles around certain critical materials like rare earths, other equally vital commodities such as tungsten and tin face similar geopolitical supply risks but receive far less attention. These 'un-hyped' bottlenecks present significant investment opportunities for diligent researchers.
While AI may make energy and labor nearly free, it cannot eliminate all scarcity. Finite resources like physical space (e.g., Malibu real estate) and time will always exist. This ensures that economic principles and competition will remain relevant in any future.
The major outage at the Grasberg mine, which supplies 3% of the world's copper, is turning a previously balanced market into a significant deficit for 2025 and 2026. This highlights supply chain fragility, as there were no existing surpluses to absorb the shock.
Beyond automating tasks, Emad Mostaque's "Intelligence Theory" suggests AI's deepest impact is shifting the foundational axiom of economics. Instead of scarcity, the new core principle is persistence: how complex systems (like firms or AIs) maintain themselves by accurately modeling and predicting reality.
