Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Unlike talking to a developer, you shouldn't specify technologies in your prompts. The AI is poor at questioning your logic. Instead, focus on describing the desired user experience with extreme clarity, as any ambiguity will statistically be misinterpreted by the AI.

Related Insights

Many users blame AI tools for generic designs when the real issue is a poorly defined initial prompt. Using a preparatory GPT to outline user goals, needs, and flows ensures a strong starting point, preventing the costly and circular revisions that stem from a vague beginning.

AI prototyping doesn't replace the PRD; it transforms its purpose. Instead of being a static document, the PRD's rich context and user stories become the ideal 'master prompt' to feed into an AI tool, ensuring the initial design is grounded in strategic requirements.

Instead of facing a blank canvas, create a custom GPT that asks a series of structured questions (e.g., product goal, target user, key flows). This process extracts the necessary context to generate a focused, high-quality initial prompt for prototyping tools.

To get precise results from AI coding tools, use established design and development language. Prompting for a "multi-select" for dietary restrictions is far more effective than vaguely asking to "add preferences," as it dictates the specific UI component to be built and avoids ambiguity.

Instead of spending time trying to craft the perfect prompt from scratch, provide a basic one and then ask the AI a simple follow-up: "What do you need from me to improve this prompt?" The AI will then list the specific context and details it requires, turning prompt engineering into a simple Q&A session.

Getting a useful result from AI is a dialogue, not a single command. An initial prompt often yields an unusable output. Success requires analyzing the failure and providing a more specific, refined prompt, much like giving an employee clearer instructions to get the desired outcome.

Instead of providing a vague functional description, feed prototyping AIs a detailed JSON data model first. This separates data from UI generation, forcing the AI to build a more realistic and higher-quality experience around concrete data, avoiding ambiguity and poor assumptions.

Successfully building with AI, even using no-code tools, demands a new level of detail from product managers. One must go deeper than a standard PRD and translate a high-level vision into extremely literal, step-by-step instructions, as the AI system cannot infer intent or fill in logical gaps.

AI lacks the implicit context humans share. Like a genie granting a wish for "taller" by making you 13 feet tall, AI will interpret vague prompts literally and produce dysfunctional results. Success requires extreme specificity and clarity in your requests because the AI doesn't know what you "mean."

Instead of immediately building, engage AI in a Socratic dialogue. Set rules like "ask one question at a time" and "probe assumptions." This structured conversation clarifies the problem and user scenarios, essentially replacing initial team brainstorming sessions and creating a better final prompt for prototyping tools.

Prompting Prototyping AI Requires Clarity of Experience, Not Technical Specs | RiffOn