Many users blame AI tools for generic designs when the real issue is a poorly defined initial prompt. Using a preparatory GPT to outline user goals, needs, and flows ensures a strong starting point, preventing the costly and circular revisions that stem from a vague beginning.

AI prototyping doesn't replace the PRD; it transforms its purpose. Instead of being a static document, the PRD's rich context and user stories become the ideal 'master prompt' to feed into an AI tool, ensuring the initial design is grounded in strategic requirements.

Instead of prompting a specialized AI tool directly, experts employ a meta-workflow. They first use a general LLM like ChatGPT or Claude to generate a detailed, context-rich 'master prompt' based on a PRD or user story, which they then paste into the specialized tool for superior results.

Instead of spending time trying to craft the perfect prompt from scratch, provide a basic one and then ask the AI a simple follow-up: "What do you need from me to improve this prompt?" The AI will then list the specific context and details it requires, turning prompt engineering into a simple Q&A session.

To move from AI theory to hands-on building, use the tool to teach you. Prompt a platform like ChatGPT or Gemini to walk you through creating a custom GPT step-by-step. It can help define the use case, write the system prompt, and refine the assistant interactively.

To get consistent results from AI, use the "3 C's" framework: Clarity (the AI's role and your goal), Context (the bigger business picture), and Cues (supporting documents like brand guides). Most users fail by not providing enough cues.

Instead of struggling to craft an effective prompt, users can ask the AI to generate it for them. Describe your goal and ask ChatGPT to 'write me the perfect ChatGPT prompt for this with exact wording, format, and style.' This meta-prompting technique leverages the AI's own capabilities for better results.

Instead of providing a vague functional description, feed prototyping AIs a detailed JSON data model first. This separates data from UI generation, forcing the AI to build a more realistic and higher-quality experience around concrete data, avoiding ambiguity and poor assumptions.

Instead of immediately building, engage AI in a Socratic dialogue. Set rules like "ask one question at a time" and "probe assumptions." This structured conversation clarifies the problem and user scenarios, essentially replacing initial team brainstorming sessions and creating a better final prompt for prototyping tools.