A key insight from analysis of Effie and System1 data is that brands get bored of their creative work long before audiences do. As strategist Mark Ritson highlighted, pulling successful campaigns prematurely forfeits the significant long-term value of "compound creativity."
Related Insights
Marketers often silo brand-building and sales-driving objectives, but they are intrinsically linked. If a creative fails to generate a short-term sales lift, it's a strong signal that it's also failing to build long-term brand equity. An ad that sells inherently delivers an equity benefit.
Instead of brainstorming subjectively and then seeking data to support a favorite idea, start with audience insights. Analyzing what content people already engage with defines the creative sandbox, leading to more effective campaigns from the outset and avoiding resource-draining failures.
The 'Mad Men' era of relying on a creative director's gut feel is obsolete. Many leaders still wrongly judge marketing creative based on their personal taste ('I don't like that picture'). The correct modern approach is to deploy content and use the resulting performance data to make informed decisions.
Marketers should use AI-driven insights at the beginning of the creative process to inform campaign strategy, rather than solely at the end for performance analysis. This approach combines human creativity with data to create more resonant campaigns and avoid generic AI-generated content.
One-off creative hits are easy, but replicating them requires structure. Truly creative marketing integrates storytelling into a disciplined process involving data analysis (washups, SWAT), strategic planning, and commercial goals. This framework provides the guardrails needed to turn creative ideas into repeatable, impactful campaigns.
Tushy's growth and brand teams collaborate to ensure ads drive performance without damaging long-term brand equity. They moved away from certain high-performing creative after asking if it created the right 'memory structure' for an increasingly premium product, prioritizing long-term perception over short-term wins.
Contrary to the belief that ads quickly wear out, strong creative often performs better with repeated exposure. This concept of "wear in" justifies patience, allowing a new campaign to build familiarity and emotional connection with the audience, as stories grow resonance over time.
By re-running a successful past Christmas ad, Amazon guaranteed an emotional hit, avoided creative fatigue, and reallocated the entire production budget to media spend for a bigger share of voice. This "bake your cakes longer" strategy challenges the industry's obsession with newness.
Familiarity breeds contentment, not contempt. The 'Mere Exposure Effect' shows that repeated exposure to a stimulus makes us feel more positive towards it. This explains why consistent campaigns outperform those that frequently change creative. The performance gap between effective, consistent campaigns and inconsistent ones widens dramatically over time, creating a compounding advantage.
Solely judging marketing by last-touch attribution creates a false reality. This narrow metric consistently favors predictable channels like search and email, discouraging investment in brand building and creative storytelling that influence buyers throughout their journey. It's a losing battle if it's the only basis for decision-making.