In a non-control deal, an investor cannot fire management. Therefore, the primary diligence focus must shift from the business itself to the founder's character and the potential for a strong partnership, as this relationship is the ultimate determinant of success.

Founders can accurately gauge an investor's future helpfulness by their actions during the pre-investment courtship phase. If an investor is unwilling to provide value when they are most motivated to win the deal, they are unlikely to be a helpful partner later on.

During due diligence, the most revealing portfolio company reference checks involve asking CEOs leading questions. Frame inquiries to suggest the private equity sponsor is taking undue credit for successes. This tactic encourages frankness and uncovers the true dynamics of value creation and deal sourcing.

A venture capitalist's career security directly impacts the founder relationship. VCs with a proven track record (like Sequoia's Andrew Reed) act as supportive partners. In contrast, junior or less successful VCs often transfer pressure from their own partnerships onto the founder, creating a stressful and counterproductive dynamic.

With high partner turnover at large venture firms, a key diligence question for founders is whether the specific partner joining their board is likely to remain at that firm. A partner's departure can be highly disruptive, making their stability more important than firm brand.

David Cohen of Techstars advises founders to request references from a VC's failed investments. This reveals how an investor behaves during difficult times, providing a more honest assessment of their character and support level than speaking only with successful founders.

Founders should press VCs on how they specifically envision working together. A strong investor can articulate a nuanced plan tailored to the team's unique needs and the founder's working style, moving beyond a generic menu of services to show true alignment and understanding of the business's goals.

When fundraising, the most critical choice isn't the VC fund's brand but the specific partner who will join the board. Sophisticated founders vet the individual's strengths, weaknesses, and working style, as that person has a more direct impact on the company than the firm's logo on a term sheet.

Competing to be a founder's "first call" is a crowded, zero-sum game. A more effective strategy is to be the "second call"—the specialist a founder turns to for a specific, difficult problem after consulting their lead investor. This positioning is more scalable, collaborative, and allows for differentiated value-add.