Bashify’s founder learned to hire not just for skills but for personality-role fit. She seeks extroverted people for client-facing roles, while preferring detail-oriented introverts for back-end tasks like packing kits. This nuanced approach improves job satisfaction and team dynamics.

Prioritizing a candidate's skills ('capacity') over their fit with the team ('chemistry') is a mistake. To scale culture successfully, focus on hiring people who will get along with their colleagues. The ability to collaborate and integrate is more critical for long-term success than a perfect resume.

Treat hiring as a compounding flywheel. A new employee should not only be a great contributor but also make the company more attractive to future A-players, whether through their network, reputation, or interview presence. This focus on recruiting potential ensures talent density increases over time.

In a collaborative sales environment, a candidate's ability to be a good teammate is more valuable than their contact list. A difficult personality with a great rolodex can harm team productivity, whereas a collaborative person can be supported in building their own network.

Sales experience on a resume can be a 'false positive.' When hiring SDRs, prioritize untrainable qualities like work ethic, mindset, and resilience over specific past roles. These character traits are a better predictor of long-term success than skills that can be taught.

Technical competence is the easiest part of a technical co-founder to evaluate. The real risks lie in misaligned goals (lifestyle vs. unicorn), personality clashes, and incompatible work styles. Prioritize assessing these crucial "human" factors first.

When evaluating sales leaders, prioritize their track record in recruiting above all else. Exceptional leaders are talent magnets who build scalable teams through strong hiring and enablement. Their ability to attract A-players is the foundation of a predictable revenue machine.

For leadership roles, the interview itself is a critical test. If the candidate isn't teaching you something new about their function, it's a red flag. A true leader should bring expertise that elevates your understanding. If you have to teach them, they will consume your time rather than create leverage.

The "attitude vs. aptitude" debate is flawed. Instead, hire the person with the smallest skill deficiency relative to the role's requirements. For a cashier, attitude is the harder skill to train. For an AI researcher, technical aptitude is. The key question is always: is it worth our resources to train this specific gap?