Prioritizing a candidate's skills ('capacity') over their fit with the team ('chemistry') is a mistake. To scale culture successfully, focus on hiring people who will get along with their colleagues. The ability to collaborate and integrate is more critical for long-term success than a perfect resume.

Simply hiring superstar "Galacticos" is an ineffective team-building strategy. A successful AI team requires a deliberate mix of three archetypes: visionaries who set direction, rigorous executors who ship product, and social "glue" who maintain team cohesion and morale.

Organizational success depends less on high-profile 'superstars' and more on 'Sherpas'—generous, energetic team players who handle the essential, often invisible, support work. When hiring, actively screen for generosity and positive energy, as these are the people who enable collective achievement.

In a collaborative sales environment, a candidate's ability to be a good teammate is more valuable than their contact list. A difficult personality with a great rolodex can harm team productivity, whereas a collaborative person can be supported in building their own network.

Hiring for "cultural fit" can lead to homogenous teams and groupthink. Instead, leaders should seek a "cultural complement"—candidates who align with core values but bring different perspectives and experiences, creating a richer and more innovative team alchemy.

Technical competence is the easiest part of a technical co-founder to evaluate. The real risks lie in misaligned goals (lifestyle vs. unicorn), personality clashes, and incompatible work styles. Prioritize assessing these crucial "human" factors first.

Visionary, fast-paced leaders naturally gravitate toward hiring people like themselves. However, to build a balanced and effective team, they must consciously hire for complementary traits—like detail-orientation and methodical thinking—to provide necessary rigor, ensure completion, and prevent burnout.

The "attitude vs. aptitude" debate is flawed. Instead, hire the person with the smallest skill deficiency relative to the role's requirements. For a cashier, attitude is the harder skill to train. For an AI researcher, technical aptitude is. The key question is always: is it worth our resources to train this specific gap?

Leveraging frameworks like Human Design transforms team collaboration. By understanding archetypes (e.g., a fast-executing Manifesting Generator vs. a guiding Projector), team members can anticipate and accommodate different work styles, turning potential points of friction into a complementary partnership.