Organizations inadvertently foster negativity through a hypocritical hiring-to-management pipeline. They recruit candidates based on their potential and strengths but, once hired, immediately shift performance evaluation to focus on their gaps and weaknesses.
Related Insights
Promoting top individual contributors into management often backfires. Their competitive nature, which drove individual success, makes it hard to share tips, empathize with struggling team members, or handle interpersonal issues, turning a perceived win-win into a lose-lose situation.
Challenge the 'hire slow' mantra. Hiring is an intuitive guess, so act quickly. Once a person is in the organization, their performance is a known fact, not a guess. This clarity allows for faster decisions—both in removing underperformers and, crucially, in accelerating the promotion of superstars ahead of standard review cycles.
Businesses invest heavily in recruiting top talent but then micromanage them, preventing them from using their full cognitive abilities. This creates a transactional environment where employees don't contribute their best ideas, leaving significant value unrealized.
A leader's attempt to increase velocity by streamlining hiring (e.g., cutting interview rounds) can be misread by the team. What the leader sees as efficiency, employees may perceive as being excluded, making them question if their voice and judgment still matter in the company.
Many leaders hire defensively, trying to avoid a costly mistake. This fear-based mindset leads to negative assumptions and misinterpretations of candidate signals. Shifting to an abundance mindset—believing the right person is out there—fosters curiosity and leads to better evaluation and hiring outcomes.
The belief that people fail due to lack of will leads to blame. Shifting to 'people do well if they can' reframes failure as a skill gap, not a will gap. This moves your role from enforcer to helper, focusing you on identifying and building missing skills.
Annual or quarterly performance reviews are high-pressure, judgmental events that create fear. A more effective approach is to reframe management as coaching. This means providing frequent, trust-based feedback focused on developing an employee's long-term potential, rather than simply rating their past performance.
People naturally start their jobs motivated and wanting to succeed. A leader's primary role isn't to be a motivational speaker but to remove the environmental and managerial barriers that crush this intrinsic drive. The job is to hire motivated people and get out of their way.
Leaders who complain their team isn't as good as them are misplacing blame. They are the ones who hired and trained those individuals. The team's failure is ultimately the leader's failure in either talent selection, skill development, or both, demanding radical ownership.
