Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Since the 2001 EP-3 incident, China learned that "going dark" during a crisis serves two purposes. Internally, it allows leadership time to deliberate. Externally, it functions as a powerful negotiating tactic that unnerves American policymakers and grants Beijing leverage to control re-engagement.

Related Insights

China is capitalizing on the chaos of Trump's foreign policy by portraying itself as a predictable and responsible global leader. While this narrative may not be accurate, America's erratic behavior makes China's case more persuasive to other nations seeking stability, allowing Beijing to gain diplomatic influence.

Beyond official diplomacy, direct meetings with US leaders like President Trump provide unfiltered data for Beijing. China's intelligence services analyze off-the-cuff remarks about domestic politics and strategic priorities to build a psychological profile and assess US weaknesses.

China's tough stance toward US allies is not a diplomatic blunder but a deliberate strategy. By applying pressure, Beijing aims to demonstrate that complaining to a distracted Washington is futile, thereby forcing allies to eventually accommodate Chinese interests.

Despite potentially positive "vibes" from diplomatic summits, the national security establishments in both the US and China will likely continue to view each other as implacable adversaries. This creates a disconnect where public-facing diplomacy fails to alter the underlying suspicion and strategic competition driven by each country's "deep state."

The inability for Western governments and analysts to get reliable information or high-level contacts within China's military and political elite is the fundamental risk. This opacity makes predicting China's actions, especially regarding military decisions, nearly impossible.

The recent lack of anti-China rhetoric from the Trump administration, including zero mentions at the State of the Union, is a deliberate tactical truce. The goal is to stabilize relations and create a favorable environment for an upcoming presidential summit with Xi Jinping, which the administration wants to be a major success.

China's approach to the Iran conflict reflects ancient principles of statecraft known as the "36 Stratagems." Tactics like "kill with a borrowed knife" (using Iran to disadvantage the U.S.) and sacrificing short-term goals for long-term gain demonstrate deep historical continuity in its foreign policy.

China is strategically using the US's engagement in the Iran conflict for diplomatic advantage. By calling for stability and mediation, it portrays itself as a responsible global power, contrasting this with the perceived instability caused by US foreign policy, which it frames as a "global wrecking ball."

China plays the long game. Instead of direct confrontation, its strategy is to wait for the U.S. to weaken itself through expensive military interventions and political division. This allows China to gain relative power without firing a shot, similar to its rise during the War on Terror.

President Xi Jinping used a phone call with President Trump not just for bilateral issues, but to strategically signal displeasure with Japan's hawkish stance on Taiwan. This "shadow play" diplomacy shows China leveraging its relationship with the U.S. to indirectly manage and warn other nations, making the U.S. a channel for its geopolitical messaging.