Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

China's approach to the Iran conflict reflects ancient principles of statecraft known as the "36 Stratagems." Tactics like "kill with a borrowed knife" (using Iran to disadvantage the U.S.) and sacrificing short-term goals for long-term gain demonstrate deep historical continuity in its foreign policy.

Related Insights

Unlike the US's focus on quarterly results and election cycles, China's leadership operates on a civilizational timescale. From their perspective, the US is a recent phenomenon, and losing the US market is an acceptable short-term cost in a much longer game of survival and dominance. This fundamental difference in strategic thinking is often missed.

The current Iran crisis could mirror the 1957 Suez Crisis, which marked the transfer of global power from the British Empire to the U.S. If China successfully leverages the situation to its diplomatic and economic advantage, it could signal a similar shift in global power away from the United States.

From China's perspective, the US being bogged down in the Iran conflict is an "unforced error" that reduces American focus and diplomatic bandwidth. This distraction is seen as an opportunity for China to gain an upper hand in ongoing trade and technology disputes.

China is intentionally staying out of the military conflict between the U.S./Israel and Iran. Its primary goals are to safeguard commercial interests, ensure the flow of energy, and act as an observer, believing there are few gains and many dangers in direct military involvement.

China is strategically using the US's engagement in the Iran conflict for diplomatic advantage. By calling for stability and mediation, it portrays itself as a responsible global power, contrasting this with the perceived instability caused by US foreign policy, which it frames as a "global wrecking ball."

China plays the long game. Instead of direct confrontation, its strategy is to wait for the U.S. to weaken itself through expensive military interventions and political division. This allows China to gain relative power without firing a shot, similar to its rise during the War on Terror.

A protracted U.S. conflict in the Middle East is a strategic gift to China. It diverts American military resources, political attention, and economic strength, allowing China to expand its influence, particularly in Asia, without direct confrontation.

While facing economic headwinds from the oil crisis, China is positioning the US-Iran conflict as a geopolitical victory. It portrays the US as a chaotic, destabilizing force, contrasting itself as a stable superpower and capitalizing on the global fallout from what it terms 'poor strategic coordination' by Washington.

Despite relying on Iranian oil, China is avoiding strong support for Tehran to protect its oil supply through the Strait of Hormuz and prevent economic reprisals from the U.S. This pragmatic, transactional approach prioritizes economic stability over ideological or military alliances.

The Iran conflict serves the strategic interests of China and Russia by distracting US attention and draining its military resources. It consumes critical assets (like Patriot missiles needed for Ukraine) and diverts political focus from containing America's primary geopolitical rivals in Europe and Asia.

China Employs Ancient '36 Stratagems' in Modern Geopolitical Crises | RiffOn