Engineering leadership involves four distinct skills: Technical, Operations, Product, and Strategy. Since no single person excels at all four, organizations should build complementary leadership teams, pairing a visionary CTO with a process-driven VP of Engineering.

When working in complex organizations like the UN or federal government, don't try to master their internal language. Instead, find and partner with internal experts who can translate your goals into the organization's native operating system to achieve impact.

When leading a function outside your expertise (e.g., a comms leader managing BDRs), success depends on hiring a great functional leader. Your role becomes asking them to explain concepts simply until you understand, trusting their expertise, and advocating for their needs, rather than trying to become the expert yourself.

A leader's value isn't being the expert in every marketing function. It's identifying a critical problem, even one they don't fully understand, and taking ownership to push it forward. This often means acting as a project manager: booking the meeting, getting the right people in the room, and driving action items.

Leaders often feel they must have all the answers, which stifles team contribution. A better approach is to hire domain experts smarter than you, actively listen to their ideas, and empower them. This creates a culture where everyone learns and the entire company's performance rises.

A common leadership trap is feeling the need to be the smartest person with all the answers. The more leveraged skill is ensuring the organization focuses on solving the right problem. As Einstein noted, defining the question correctly is the majority of the work toward the solution.

An M&A lead's role isn't to be an expert in tax or IT, but to assemble specialists. Like a general contractor, they must know enough to spot issues ('wires sticking out of the wall') and deploy the right expert, synthesizing findings to assess valuation and integration hurdles.

Leaders, especially those from highly individualistic fields like surgery, must evolve from a top-down, self-reliant style to one that orchestrates diverse opinions. This approach fosters better problem-solving by surrounding oneself with people who have different, often stronger, skills.

Traditional leadership, designed for the industrial era, uses control to maximize manual output. In today's knowledge economy, leaders must shift to providing context and problems to solve, thereby maximizing what their teams can achieve with their minds.