When WCM refreshed its portfolio, the new holdings initially lagged behind the old ones as the market snapped back. This created a "lonely" period of intense self-doubt and internal questioning. This highlights the emotional difficulty of sticking with a process change before results validate the decision.

Related Insights

After a massive failure with their domestic fund, WCM launched an international strategy staffed with an operations person with zero investment experience and a business school dropout. This counterintuitive bet on raw talent and a fresh perspective became the foundation for their turnaround and massive growth.

When pursuing breakthrough ideas ("10x thinking"), the process is inherently uncomfortable. It's crucial to distinguish this discomfort, which signals you're pushing boundaries, from the feeling of being wrong. Embracing this discomfort is key to innovation in ambiguous, early-stage product development.

The Browser Company's pivot required spending the "trust points" they'd built with their team and community. Leaders must be prepared for this painful drawdown and the internal/external backlash, even when they have high conviction in the new direction. It's a necessary but difficult part of a major strategic shift.

While long-term focus is a virtue, investment managers at WCM warn it can become an excuse for inaction. During periods of significant market change, blindly "sticking to your knitting" is a liability. Recognizing when to sensibly adapt versus when to stay the course is a critical and nuanced skill.

When contemplating change, we focus on what we're about to lose, making the decision feel monumental. Kate Raworth shares that the anxiety of giving up her car disappeared immediately after, replaced by lightness. This psychological barrier, the intense focus on loss right before action, is a key hurdle in transformation.

Deciding to pivot isn't about perseverance; it's a cold, rational decision made when you've exhausted all non-ridiculous ideas for success. The main barrier is emotional—it's "fucking humiliating" to admit you were wrong. The key is to separate the intellectual decision from the emotional cost.

Facing the same blocker repeatedly—in Kalshi's case, government rejection—is uniquely demoralizing. It causes the team to question the core strategy and leadership's judgment, leading to significant attrition and a collapse in faith that is harder to recover from than varied challenges.

When driving major organizational change, a data-driven approach from the start is crucial for overcoming emotional resistance to established ways of working. Building a strong business case based on financial and market metrics can depersonalize the discussion and align stakeholders more quickly than relying on vision alone.

Agency leaders often delay decisions for fear of being wrong, creating significant opportunity costs and mental distraction. This paralysis is more damaging than the risk of an incorrect choice. Any decision is better than indecision because it provides momentum and learning, a lesson especially critical for small or solo-led agencies.

In an industry that punishes process evolution, WCM sets the expectation with clients that their investment approach will and should change. They ask clients to hold them accountable for this evolution, reframing change from a risk into a core value proposition of continuous improvement.