The common practice of adding a gender qualifier ('female') to a woman's leadership title, while not doing so for men, reinforces the idea that male is the default and female is the exception. This linguistic habit subtly perpetuates inequality and should be consciously avoided.
Related Insights
Women and people of color often believe they need another certification to be qualified, while men confidently pursue roles with fewer prerequisites. This highlights a systemic confidence and perception gap, not a competence gap, where women over-prepare to compensate for perceived shortcomings.
When something goes wrong at a large company, the brand is blamed (e.g., Amazon). But for female-led companies where the founder is the face, Jacqueline Johnson notes criticism is intensely personal, targeting her directly rather than the business entity.
Despite women earning nearly 60% of college degrees—the primary qualification for members of Congress—they hold only 26% of seats. This statistical disparity suggests that American voters still subconsciously conflate stereotypically male traits like height and a deep voice with leadership, creating a systemic bias against female candidates.
Women are often taught that there is virtue in not taking credit and staying in the background. This social conditioning encourages self-erasure, preventing them from claiming their power and perpetuating a system where their contributions are overlooked.
Citing the Global Media Monitoring Project, data shows men are quoted as experts 75% of the time. This isn't just a fairness issue; it leads to narrower, less interesting stories by repeatedly amplifying the same perspectives and reinforcing systemic biases about who holds authority.
Societal applause for women excelling in male domains like CEO leadership, while downplaying nurturing roles, subtly implies that masculine pursuits are inherently more valuable. This reveals a form of patronizing sexism from within progressive circles.
Instead of setting diversity quotas for her male-dominated tech network, Muriel Faberge simply encouraged members to invite their female colleagues, sisters, and even mothers. This simple, personal approach naturally led to a balanced community with roughly equal gender representation, without forced mandates.
Public discourse comfortably accepts generalizations that women are better doctors, but similar statements about men being better entrepreneurs due to risk-aggression are met with discomfort. This reveals a bias in how gender-based attributes are perceived and discussed.
A newsroom's "DNA"—its ingrained sense of what constitutes a front-page story—often remains male-centric even with a woman in charge. Deep-seated biases that value topics like policy over childcare persist, meaning systemic change requires more than just a change in leadership.
A private equity professional explains how she shifted her mindset from being intimidated as the only woman on her team to using it as a source of power. By embracing her unique position, she commands attention and respect in a way that differentiates her.
