The debate over AI filmmaking is misframed. AI is unlikely to create a universally acclaimed blockbuster. Instead, its strength lies in generating high volumes of "good enough" content tailored to specific subcultures and niche interests, catering to modern, fragmented media consumption habits.
Related Insights
While AI tools once gave creators an edge, they now risk producing democratized, undifferentiated output. IBM's AI VP, who grew to 200k followers, now uses AI less. The new edge is spending more time on unique human thinking and using AI only for initial ideation, not final writing.
Generative AI is a powerful tool for accelerating the production and refinement of creative work, but it cannot replace human taste or generate a truly compelling core idea. The most effective use of AI is as a partner to execute a pre-existing, human-driven concept, not as the source of the idea itself.
The fear that AI will replace top artists is misplaced. The correct framing is what happens when top talent gets AI tools. A director like Steven Spielberg could potentially increase their output 20-fold for a fraction of the cost, leading to a massive increase in high-quality creative work.
Don't view generative AI video as just a way to make traditional films more efficiently. Ben Horowitz sees it as a fundamentally new creative medium, much like movies were to theater. It enables entirely new forms of storytelling by making visuals that once required massive budgets accessible to anyone.
Sam Altman argues the AI vs. human content debate is a false dichotomy. The dominant creative form will be a hybrid where humans use AI as a tool. Consumers will ultimately judge content on its quality and originality ('is it slop?'), not on its method of creation.
The term "slop" is misattributed to AI. It actually describes any generic, undifferentiated output designed for mass appeal, a problem that existed in human-made media long before LLMs. AI is simply a new tool for scaling its creation.
Social media allows anyone to be a "reality TV star," but creating high-production fiction requires immense capital. As AI tools democratize filmmaking, countless talented storytellers who prefer working behind the scenes—the Christopher Nolans of the world—can finally produce their visions.
The OpenAI team believes generative video won't just create traditional feature films more easily. It will give rise to entirely new mediums and creator classes, much like the film camera created cinema, a medium distinct from the recorded stage plays it was first used for.
While photorealism is a common goal, the first fully AI-generated films will likely be animated or fantasy. This is because traditional filmmaking is already cheap and effective at capturing reality. AI's true economic and creative advantage lies in generating complex, non-photorealistic visuals that are currently expensive to produce.
Actor Ben Affleck claims generative AI will struggle to create meaningful films because it inherently averages existing data. This produces derivative, "shitty" content. Truly great art, he implies, stems from unique, outlier human experiences—like an actor channeling personal tragedy—which a model trained on a corpus of content cannot replicate.
